I had some performance problems and tried out alwaysHydrate, awaitRemote and awaitRemoteWhenNoneExist. As expected awaitRemoteWhenNoneExist was the fastest policy. But alwaysHydrate seems to be slow like awaitRemote.

According to the doc

  /// This hydration is unawaited and is not guaranteed to complete before results are returned.
  /// This can be expensive to perform for some queries; see [awaitRemoteWhenNoneExist]
  /// for a more performant option or [awaitRemote] to await the hydration before returning results.

If the hydration is not awaited then i don't understand why i don't get any speedup. I expected that the local results are returned fast and that i get the updated data with a small delays.