Skip to content

Should the Operation in P2POperation include a Synchronization field? #25

@erdunn

Description

@erdunn

One of the attributes of PUT operations is the ability to specific a Synchronization type, i.e. one of WRITETHROUGH, WRITEBACK, or FLUSH.

Should the Operation sub-message of a P2POperation also include that ability?

If not, what is the expected (default) behavior for a PUT operation generated from a P2POperation? Is it it WRITETHROUGH, WRITEBACK, or FLUSH?

-Eric

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions