Review: LW/AF Post Draft v1

[PipFoweraker]

Action Required

Review drafts/lw-af-post-v1.md and provide feedback for revision.

Draft Details

• Location: drafts/lw-af-post-v1.md
• Word count: ~2500
• Commit: 0235fcf

Current Tone

Direct, evidence-first, controlled sardonic edge. Examples:

• "proprietary mix tells us exactly nothing"
• "here are the weights, good luck school of open-source release"

Review Checklist

• Tone appropriate for LW/AF audience?
• Claims accurate and defensible?
• Sardonic elements: dial up, down, or keep?
• Missing arguments or context?
• Structure/flow issues?
• Call to action compelling?

Key Sections to Review

1. Problem framing — Is the critique of current model cards fair?
2. The 14 questions — Any missing? Any that shouldn't be MUST-level?
3. Empirical results — Scoring methodology reasonable?
4. "Why this might work" — Persuasive? Naive?
5. "What I'm not claiming" — Sufficient hedging?

After Review

Add comments to this issue with notes, then we can iterate on v2.

---

Target publication: mid-February, after Certes setup and personal website update