Skip to content

Switch from strings to keywords as "type of step" labels #88

@NicMcPhee

Description

@NicMcPhee

In functions like recursive-validate we're passing in a sequence of strings that indicate whether a given step is an equivalence/equality step or an implication step.

We probably ought to be using keywords like :equals and :implies (and :follows-from when we implement that in #75) instead of just strings.

I also wonder if passing in these parallel sequences is the best bet here. We could instead have a single, structured input instead. That might simplify some things where, for example, we currently have to worry about the number of rules and expressions not lining up correctly.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions