Skip to content

make it clear why "refine search" list of mines isn't alphabetic #83

@yochannah

Description

@yochannah

In the refine search screen, we decided to put InterMines with results first in the mine list - see #19 . Gos pointed out that unless you know why it's the case, it can seem strange that the mines are out of order.

"I wonder one day whether there could be a separator or other mark (black vs grey) that would help teach users that there are "two" lists in one?"

Could even include headings - e.g. "mines with no results" or something shorter if we can think of it.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions