Wishlist: consider merging efforts?

[NightTsarina]

Hi!

I was very happy to find your repo today, after realising @twmht's fork seems more or less abandoned, and I could not even make the pybind11 branch work. I see that there is still lots of catching up to do with the C++ library, but seeing that you have been recently active gives me hope!

I am desperately needing some working python bindings, and I might even try to get transactions support working for my project. I might also try to package this library for Debian (as I am a Debian Developer).

So this issue is to suggest merging in the changes from @iFA88's fork, as I see they have also been committing fixes. I wanted to open a similar issue on their repository, but sadly the issue tracker is not enabled.

Thanks for your work!

[martyanov]

@NightTsarina Hi!

I'm sorry for such a delayed reply, I somehow missed your message!

Great thanks for your interest in the project!

The only addition I made is properly working CI to built wheel packges with actual version of RocksDB, almost everything else ramains intact. For our tasks it is pretty usable in current state, we have very limited feature set requirements. I have plans to refactor and improve test suite and fix ongoing bugs, but not sure if it is critical at the moment.