Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request updates the error message for a specific exception, revises the page protection logic in the service implementation, reformats SQL mapper XML files for clarity, and adjusts test cases. The changes include modifying the exception message in an enum, altering the method signature and logic in page management, reformatting SQL statements, and updating or removing specific test methods to align with the new behavior. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Caller (updatePage)
participant PS as PageServiceImpl
participant DB as Database
Client->>PS: updatePage(page)
PS->>PS: protectDefaultPage(page)
alt Page is default (parentId "0")
PS->>PS: getSubPage() & getParentPage()
PS->>DB: Execute UpdateWrapper to adjust is_default status
DB-->>PS: Return update result
else Not a default page
PS-->>PS: Skip default page protection
end
PS-->>Client: Return boolean (success/failure)
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java (1)
573-602: Optimize for large hierarchies
getSubPagerecursively scans child pages for a default page. In deeply nested or wide tree structures, consider an iterative approach or a more optimized query to avoid performance overhead.base/src/main/resources/mappers/PageMapper.xml (2)
308-308: Formatting Improvement in UPDATE StatementThe
WHEREclause in theupdatePageByIdstatement has been reformatted into a single line. This change improves conciseness while preserving the query's logic. Ensure that this style is consistent with other SQL mapper files throughout the project.
314-357: Enhanced INSERT Statement FormattingThe INSERT clause has been reformatted to vertically align the column names and their corresponding value placeholders. This not only enhances readability but also makes maintaining the column ordering easier. Please verify that the reordered formatting does not inadvertently alter the intended mapping between columns and parameters.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/exception/ExceptionEnum.java(1 hunks)base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java(3 hunks)base/src/main/resources/mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml(1 hunks)base/src/main/resources/mappers/PageMapper.xml(1 hunks)base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/gateway/ai/AiChatClientTest.java(0 hunks)base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImplTest.java(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/gateway/ai/AiChatClientTest.java
🔇 Additional comments (7)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/exception/ExceptionEnum.java (1)
151-151:Details
✅ Verification successful
Double-check consistency with deletion scenarios
Changing the message from “默认页面不能删除和修改” to “默认页面修改失败” narrows the focus to modification alone. If future callers also expect this exception to handle deletion, users might be confused if they encounter it during a deletion attempt.
Would you like to confirm that this exception is never triggered when deleting a default page?
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Searching all references to confirm usage context for the CM301 code rg 'CM301'Length of output: 245
Review Confirmation: CM301 Exception is Modification-Specific
- Verified with a repository search, the exception is only referenced in
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.javaand in the exception definition.- There’s no indication that
CM301is ever used within a deletion workflow.- The error message “默认页面修改失败” is consistent with its current usage focused solely on modification failures.
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImplTest.java (2)
205-205: Ensure changes align with default page logicSwitching the parent ID to "0" more accurately tests the scenario where a page sits at the root hierarchy, aligning with the new default page protection approach.
212-212: Validate root-level assumptionsChanging
queryPage.setParentId("1")to"0"likewise ensures the test checks a top-level page. Confirm that all other dependent tests or methods use consistent parent ID values.base/src/main/resources/mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml (1)
359-359: No functional changes foundThis refactoring of the
WHEREclause to a single line has no negative impact and improves readability.base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java (3)
16-16: Introducing UpdateWrapper for partial updatesAdding
UpdateWrappermakes sense for fine-grained control in MyBatis. No concerns here.
319-322: Guarding default page modificationsThis new check prevents alterations to protected pages by leveraging
protectDefaultPage. Returning the CM301 error if the page is default is consistent with the updated error message.
535-557:Details
✅ Verification successful
Consider potential unintended default status removal
protectDefaultPageforcibly unsetsis_defaulton the located subpage, which might be broader than needed if the user intended a smaller update. Confirm this removal is always desired.Would you like me to search for all callsites of
protectDefaultPageto confirm there are no unexpected side effects?
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash #!/bin/bash rg 'protectDefaultPage'Length of output: 281
Action Required: Confirm the Intended Behavior for Default Status Removal
After verifying the call sites, we found that the only invocation of
protectDefaultPageis withinPageServiceImpl.java. This indicates that the forced removal ofis_defaulton the subpage is used in a controlled and isolated context. Assuming that this behavior matches the design intent, no unintended side effects appear to be present. However, if there’s any possibility that a more granular update might be preferable, please consider adding inline documentation to clarify the rationale behind unsetting the default status.
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Refactor