Skip to content

Comments

fix: page update api#195

Merged
lu-yg merged 60 commits intoopentiny:developfrom
lu-yg:develop
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

fix: page update api#195
lu-yg merged 60 commits intoopentiny:developfrom
lu-yg:develop

Conversation

@lu-yg
Copy link
Collaborator

@lu-yg lu-yg commented Mar 20, 2025

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • The default page error messaging has been updated to provide clearer and more precise feedback when page modifications fail, helping users better understand the issue.
  • Refactor

    • The logic for handling default pages during update and deletion operations has been enhanced for greater reliability, ensuring that critical pages are properly safeguarded.

lu-yg and others added 30 commits December 26, 2024 00:15
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the error message for a specific exception, revises the page protection logic in the service implementation, reformats SQL mapper XML files for clarity, and adjusts test cases. The changes include modifying the exception message in an enum, altering the method signature and logic in page management, reformatting SQL statements, and updating or removing specific test methods to align with the new behavior.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/exception/ExceptionEnum.java Updated exception message for CM301 from "默认页面不能删除和修改" to "默认页面修改失败".
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java Revised protectDefaultPage: changed signature from (Page, Integer) (void) to (Page) returning boolean; adjusted its internal logic and added helper methods.
base/src/.../mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml
base/src/.../mappers/PageMapper.xml
Reformatted SQL statement formatting (single line WHERE clause, aligned columns/values) without affecting SQL logic.
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/gateway/ai/AiChatClientTest.java
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImplTest.java
Removed the testInvalidTokenExecuteChatRequest method from AiChatClientTest and updated the expected parentId value in PageServiceImplTest from "1" to "0".

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as Caller (updatePage)
    participant PS as PageServiceImpl
    participant DB as Database

    Client->>PS: updatePage(page)
    PS->>PS: protectDefaultPage(page)
    alt Page is default (parentId "0")
        PS->>PS: getSubPage() & getParentPage()
        PS->>DB: Execute UpdateWrapper to adjust is_default status
        DB-->>PS: Return update result
    else Not a default page
        PS-->>PS: Skip default page protection
    end
    PS-->>Client: Return boolean (success/failure)
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • zhangjuncao

Poem

Oh, I'm a rabbit, hopping with glee,
In a code garden where changes run free.
Errors refined and logic so neat,
SQL lines aligned, what a treat!
Hop along, friends, with joy in each byte,
Celebrating our code in pure delight!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java (1)

573-602: Optimize for large hierarchies

getSubPage recursively scans child pages for a default page. In deeply nested or wide tree structures, consider an iterative approach or a more optimized query to avoid performance overhead.

base/src/main/resources/mappers/PageMapper.xml (2)

308-308: Formatting Improvement in UPDATE Statement

The WHERE clause in the updatePageById statement has been reformatted into a single line. This change improves conciseness while preserving the query's logic. Ensure that this style is consistent with other SQL mapper files throughout the project.


314-357: Enhanced INSERT Statement Formatting

The INSERT clause has been reformatted to vertically align the column names and their corresponding value placeholders. This not only enhances readability but also makes maintaining the column ordering easier. Please verify that the reordered formatting does not inadvertently alter the intended mapping between columns and parameters.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 850b804 and 934130f.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/exception/ExceptionEnum.java (1 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java (3 hunks)
  • base/src/main/resources/mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml (1 hunks)
  • base/src/main/resources/mappers/PageMapper.xml (1 hunks)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/gateway/ai/AiChatClientTest.java (0 hunks)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImplTest.java (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/gateway/ai/AiChatClientTest.java
🔇 Additional comments (7)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/exception/ExceptionEnum.java (1)

151-151:

Details

✅ Verification successful

Double-check consistency with deletion scenarios

Changing the message from “默认页面不能删除和修改” to “默认页面修改失败” narrows the focus to modification alone. If future callers also expect this exception to handle deletion, users might be confused if they encounter it during a deletion attempt.

Would you like to confirm that this exception is never triggered when deleting a default page?


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Searching all references to confirm usage context for the CM301 code
rg 'CM301'

Length of output: 245


Review Confirmation: CM301 Exception is Modification-Specific

  • Verified with a repository search, the exception is only referenced in base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java and in the exception definition.
  • There’s no indication that CM301 is ever used within a deletion workflow.
  • The error message “默认页面修改失败” is consistent with its current usage focused solely on modification failures.
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImplTest.java (2)

205-205: Ensure changes align with default page logic

Switching the parent ID to "0" more accurately tests the scenario where a page sits at the root hierarchy, aligning with the new default page protection approach.


212-212: Validate root-level assumptions

Changing queryPage.setParentId("1") to "0" likewise ensures the test checks a top-level page. Confirm that all other dependent tests or methods use consistent parent ID values.

base/src/main/resources/mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml (1)

359-359: No functional changes found

This refactoring of the WHERE clause to a single line has no negative impact and improves readability.

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java (3)

16-16: Introducing UpdateWrapper for partial updates

Adding UpdateWrapper makes sense for fine-grained control in MyBatis. No concerns here.


319-322: Guarding default page modifications

This new check prevents alterations to protected pages by leveraging protectDefaultPage. Returning the CM301 error if the page is default is consistent with the updated error message.


535-557:

Details

✅ Verification successful

Consider potential unintended default status removal

protectDefaultPage forcibly unsets is_default on the located subpage, which might be broader than needed if the user intended a smaller update. Confirm this removal is always desired.

Would you like me to search for all callsites of protectDefaultPage to confirm there are no unexpected side effects?


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
#!/bin/bash
rg 'protectDefaultPage'

Length of output: 281


Action Required: Confirm the Intended Behavior for Default Status Removal

After verifying the call sites, we found that the only invocation of protectDefaultPage is within PageServiceImpl.java. This indicates that the forced removal of is_default on the subpage is used in a controlled and isolated context. Assuming that this behavior matches the design intent, no unintended side effects appear to be present. However, if there’s any possibility that a more granular update might be preferable, please consider adding inline documentation to clarify the rationale behind unsetting the default status.

@lu-yg lu-yg merged commit 2de54a8 into opentiny:develop Mar 20, 2025
1 check passed
lu-yg added a commit to lu-yg/tiny-engine-backend-java that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants