zcash is killing me along with everyone who follows their philosophy - zingo no diffrent

[skironDotNet]

I just updated the rating on the play store to 5 stars, seeing that it now "supports" multiple T addresses but I didn't realized only for receiving.
Why the ZEC community does not understand the exchanges WILL NOT credit your ZEC deposit if it comes form the shield address.
I unshieleded some funds to T address just to learn I can't spend it to another T address that would be an exchange provided address. Is this is some kind of joke to force the privacy on me? Is ZEC community like Microsoft "can't install this software because it was not digital signed and may harm your computer", what if I want it to be harmed? What if I don't want privacy? I want freedom!

Why? Why? why can't send from T to T? is this enforced at the ZEC protocol level? All I need is to spend the remaining zec and forget this shitcoin forever.

I appreciate your hard work. Working for free is hard, but I just disagree with "ZEC philosophy" and you being tainted by it.

[Oscar-Pepper]

I am a zingo dev and I have raised this in the past as I also need this feature. We depend on librustzcash libraries for send which means we cant easily implement this without writing our own send implementation which we dont have the bandwidth for currently. We support sending to TEX addresses which means it is sent from your shielded pool into an "ephemeral" transparent address that your wallet creates. Then the funds are sent from this transparent address to the TEX address an exchange will provide you with (which is essentially a transparent address). The issues with this is that exchanges dont always provide TEX addresses but i am discussing whether we can do something about this in app.