fix: models translation missed

[deepin-mozart]

add q_object in class to void this issue

Log: bug fix
Change-Id: Ia367d56b01d95f8bf4e0ac784abc27c9fc1ddad6

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

• Add Q_OBJECT macro to OptionCustomModelsGenerator class to fix translation issues.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The pull request addresses a bug fix by adding the Q_OBJECT macro to the OptionCustomModelsGenerator class to ensure proper translation and signal-slot mechanism functionality.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added Q_OBJECT macro to the OptionCustomModelsGenerator class to fix translation issues.	Inserted Q_OBJECT macro at the beginning of the class definition.	src/plugins/aimanager/option/optioncustommodelsgenerator.h

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[deepin-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-mozart

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• debian/deepin/OWNERS [deepin-mozart]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @deepin-mozart - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• It would be helpful to add a comment explaining why Q_OBJECT fixes the translation issue.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[deepin-ci-robot]

deepin pr auto review

在代码审查过程中，我会关注以下几个方面：

1. 语法和逻辑：确保代码遵循C++和Qt的语法规则，逻辑正确无误。
2. 代码质量：检查代码的可读性、可维护性以及是否遵循了良好的编程实践。
3. 性能：评估代码是否可能导致性能问题，例如不必要的内存分配、循环效率等。
4. 安全性：检查代码是否存在安全漏洞，如内存泄漏、未初始化的变量使用等。

根据提供的代码更改，我注意到以下几点：

1. 新增的宏：在类声明中添加了Q_OBJECT宏。这个宏是Qt元对象系统的一部分，用于启用信号和槽机制。如果这个类确实需要使用Qt的信号和槽机制，那么这个更改是合理的。但是，如果这个类不需要使用这些特性，那么添加这个宏可能会引入不必要的依赖和复杂性。

2. 代码质量：代码更改非常简单，只添加了一个宏。从代码质量的角度来看，这个更改没有明显的负面影响。但是，如果这个类确实需要使用Qt的信号和槽机制，那么这个更改是合理的。

3. 性能：这个更改本身不会对性能产生直接影响。

4. 安全性：这个更改本身不会对安全性产生直接影响。

综上所述，这个代码更改看起来是合理的，只要确保这个类确实需要使用Qt的信号和槽机制。如果不需要，可以考虑移除Q_OBJECT宏以简化代码。