Skip to content

Conversation

@lukasdreyer
Copy link
Collaborator

@lukasdreyer lukasdreyer commented Oct 21, 2025

Closes #1905

Describe your changes here:
Improve the calculation of the ancestor id by avoiding computing all information in the ancestor

All these boxes must be checked by the AUTHOR before requesting review:

  • The PR is small enough to be reviewed easily. If not, consider splitting up the changes in multiple PRs.
  • The title starts with one of the following prefixes: Documentation:, Bugfix:, Feature:, Improvement: or Other:.
  • If the PR is related to an issue, make sure to link it.
  • The author made sure that, as a reviewer, he/she would check all boxes below.

All these boxes must be checked by the REVIEWERS before merging the pull request:

As a reviewer please read through all the code lines and make sure that the code is fully understood, bug free, well-documented and well-structured.

General

  • The reviewer executed the new code features at least once and checked the results manually.
  • The code follows the t8code coding guidelines.
  • New source/header files are properly added to the CMake files.
  • The code is well documented. In particular, all function declarations, structs/classes and their members have a proper doxygen documentation.
  • All new algorithms and data structures are sufficiently optimal in terms of memory and runtime (If this should be merged, but there is still potential for optimization, create a new issue).

Tests

  • The code is covered in an existing or new test case using Google Test.
  • The code coverage of the project (reported in the CI) should not decrease. If coverage is decreased, make sure that this is reasonable and acceptable.
  • Valgrind doesn't find any bugs in the new code. This script can be used to check for errors; see also this wiki article.

If the Pull request introduces code that is not covered by the github action (for example coupling with a new library):

  • Should this use case be added to the github action?
  • If not, does the specific use case compile and all tests pass (check manually).

Scripts and Wiki

  • If a new directory with source files is added, it must be covered by the script/find_all_source_files.scp to check the indentation of these files.
  • If this PR introduces a new feature, it must be covered in an example or tutorial and a Wiki article.

License

  • The author added a BSD statement to doc/ (or already has one).

@lukasdreyer lukasdreyer force-pushed the enhancement-ancestor_id branch 2 times, most recently from 246f6bc to ef8e8b6 Compare October 22, 2025 07:31
@lukasdreyer lukasdreyer reopened this Oct 22, 2025
@lukasdreyer lukasdreyer force-pushed the enhancement-standalone_type_uint8 branch from f219b33 to 2fd0b6a Compare October 22, 2025 11:23
@lukasdreyer lukasdreyer force-pushed the enhancement-ancestor_id branch from ef8e8b6 to ced49cb Compare October 22, 2025 11:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.16%. Comparing base (c5e2676) to head (bb8e4e4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                        Coverage Diff                         @@
##           enhancement-standalone_type_uint8    #1903   +/-   ##
==================================================================
  Coverage                              76.15%   76.16%           
==================================================================
  Files                                    103      103           
  Lines                                  19424    19430    +6     
==================================================================
+ Hits                                   14792    14798    +6     
  Misses                                  4632     4632           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@lukasdreyer lukasdreyer force-pushed the enhancement-ancestor_id branch from 11f2a9b to bb8e4e4 Compare October 22, 2025 13:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@holke holke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.
Would love to have some comments to explain the computation.

Also suggested a minor change.

Comment on lines +658 to +666
int child_id;
if constexpr (T8_ELEMENT_NUM_EQUATIONS[TEclass]) {
u_int8_t type = element_compute_type_at_level (el, level);
child_id = t8_element_type_cubeid_to_Iloc<TEclass>[type][cube_id];
}
else {
child_id = cube_id;
}
return child_id;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
int child_id;
if constexpr (T8_ELEMENT_NUM_EQUATIONS[TEclass]) {
u_int8_t type = element_compute_type_at_level (el, level);
child_id = t8_element_type_cubeid_to_Iloc<TEclass>[type][cube_id];
}
else {
child_id = cube_id;
}
return child_id;
if constexpr (T8_ELEMENT_NUM_EQUATIONS[TEclass]) {
u_int8_t type = element_compute_type_at_level (el, level);
return t8_element_type_cubeid_to_Iloc<TEclass>[type][cube_id];
}
else {
return cube_id;
}

element_get_ancestor (el, level, &ancestor);
return element_get_child_id ((const t8_element_t *) &ancestor);
int cube_id = 0;
for (int idim = 0; idim < T8_ELEMENT_DIM[TEclass]; idim++) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please add some comments to explain the formula?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants