-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
WinHttp.WinHttpRequest.5.1 usage #512
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mlipok
wants to merge
4
commits into
Danp2:master
Choose a base branch
from
mlipok:WinHttp.WinHttpRequest.5.1
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the function header should be
; #INTERNAL_USE_ONLY# ======and the function should be__WD_DownloadAsBinaryinstead of_WD_DownloadAsBinary. Actually it does not matter, but it would fulfill the consistency 😇 .Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you have any reason to change
_WD_DownloadAsBinaryinto internal usage only then you should try to apply the same reason to_WD_DownloadFileand see if this reason also makes sense here.If you say that
_WD_DownloadFilesave data to file I would say that the destination does not matter here as I always try to avoid writing data to files on disk. Instead, I process the data in memory and write to database.This is because of security reason (i.e. GDPR law) - I simply try to minimize the number of places where data leaves a trace (files on disc).
Summary: if any user of this UDF needs to use the function for download and writing data to a file, then the function of writing data to memory without writing it to disk is equally necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Understood and fair enough @mlipok 👍 .
Then at least the README.md file also has to be adjusted, right?
I mean the additional function should be described in the README like the other functions too.
Is this usually made by @Danp2 ? I believe he do a "Prep release" commit which will contain such things, right? Or do we as PR authors also adjust these files 🤔 ?
Best regards
Sven
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Danp2
What you think about ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Danp2 can you look here ?