Skip to content

[omnibus][automated] Bump OMNIBUS_SOFTWARE_VERSION#33570

Merged
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
automated/omnibus-software/567
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

[omnibus][automated] Bump OMNIBUS_SOFTWARE_VERSION#33570
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
automated/omnibus-software/567

Conversation

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Automatically created by merging DataDog/omnibus-software#567
⚠️ This PR is opened with the qa/no-code-change label by default. Please make sure this is appropriate

@agent-platform-auto-pr agent-platform-auto-pr bot added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/agent-delivery labels Jan 30, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr agent-platform-auto-pr bot requested review from a team as code owners January 30, 2025 08:10
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Jan 30, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 54411217 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor db518f4b0da801580e578eea3c42894a82b2ed1a

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.22MB ⚠️ 912.10MB 911.88MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.22MB ⚠️ 478.05MB 477.83MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.22MB ⚠️ 921.83MB 921.62MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.22MB ⚠️ 921.83MB 921.62MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.22MB ⚠️ 899.48MB 899.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.22MB ⚠️ 909.20MB 908.99MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 59.01MB 59.01MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 59.09MB 59.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 59.09MB 59.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 56.50MB 56.50MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 93.83MB 93.83MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 93.90MB 93.90MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 93.90MB 93.90MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 89.88MB 89.88MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 89.95MB 89.95MB 0.50MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@cit-pr-commenter
Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 75d7738a-7119-4211-b680-7a21e67a74eb

Baseline: db518f4
Comparison: 7c367d2
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.95 [+0.02, +1.87] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.36 [+0.32, +0.40] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.29 [-0.18, +0.76] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.08 [-0.70, +0.86] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.26, +0.29] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.02, +0.03] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.65, +0.63] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.81, +0.76] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.95, +0.88] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.06 [-0.96, +0.84] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.07 [-0.86, +0.72] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.09 [-0.95, +0.78] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.18 [-0.25, -0.11] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization -0.24 [-0.31, -0.18] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.26 [-3.32, +2.80] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.78 [-0.84, -0.71] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@chouquette
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2025-01-30 14:14:18 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 26m.


2025-01-30 14:42:38 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 360b074 into main Jan 30, 2025
248 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the automated/omnibus-software/567 branch January 30, 2025 14:42
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.64.0 milestone Jan 30, 2025
clarkb7 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2025
Co-authored-by: chouquette <chouquette@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-delivery

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants