-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
[SVLS 8070] Switch dd-octo permissions to running a workflow for serverless-init ghcr #997
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SVLS 8070] Switch dd-octo permissions to running a workflow for serverless-init ghcr #997
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this truly needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The dd-octo folks claim to do a periodic review of these: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SECENG/pages/5138645099/User+guide+dd-octo-sts#%3Abest%3A-Best-practices
| permissions: | ||
| packages: write | ||
| metadata: read | ||
| actions: write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
add line to avoid eol lint error
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: do we want the scripts to be inline or do we want them in a separate file?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have absolutely no opinion on this! Happy to move them wherever y'all prefer, though if you want serverless-init in as little of the repo as possible, then inline makes sense
duncanista
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM – left some comments
52bc98f to
215edba
Compare
3c1cca8 to
63001b8
Compare
Overview
Testing