-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 372
fix(kafkajs): include kafka_cluster_id in DSM backlog offset tracking #7569
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
robcarlan-datadog
wants to merge
6
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
rob.carlan/DSMON-1226/kafkajs-dsm-backlog-cluster-id
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+47
−26
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2ac6efe
fix(kafkajs): include kafka_cluster_id in DSM backlog offset tracking
robcarlan-datadog 871e89d
test(kafkajs): add comments explaining clusterIdAvailable version guard
robcarlan-datadog 15f2c0a
test(kafkajs): remove irrelevant comment from getDsmPathwayHash
robcarlan-datadog 11f35ba
Merge branch 'master' into rob.carlan/DSMON-1226/kafkajs-dsm-backlog-…
robcarlan-datadog b3d6e3c
fix(kafkajs): add comment explaining resolvedClusterId safety
robcarlan-datadog a304de5
Merge branch 'rob.carlan/DSMON-1226/kafkajs-dsm-backlog-cluster-id' o…
robcarlan-datadog File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This relies on an assumption of an implementation detail to work, which is that
COMMIT_OFFSETSwill always happen in the context of a run, synchronously, and that no 2 runs can run concurrently. Have you validated that this assumption is correct? If yes, then I would add a comment clarifying that as it's critical for this to work properly and for future readers.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good point. I checked that's the case and added a comment
There should be only one run (here and the
COMMIT_OFFSETSonly happens in the offsetManager which is only used within the context of run.