Skip to content

Add GNU General Public License v3#28

Open
dark-Invincible wants to merge 1 commit intoDjedAlliance:mainfrom
dark-Invincible:patch-1
Open

Add GNU General Public License v3#28
dark-Invincible wants to merge 1 commit intoDjedAlliance:mainfrom
dark-Invincible:patch-1

Conversation

@dark-Invincible
Copy link

@dark-Invincible dark-Invincible commented Dec 14, 2025

Added the GNU General Public License version 3 to the project.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added GPLv3 license file to the project, providing complete license terms and conditions for software distribution and usage.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Added the GNU General Public License version 3 to the project.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 14, 2025

Walkthrough

A GPLv3 license document has been added to the repository. The file contains the complete GNU General Public License version 3 text, including preamble, definitions, terms, conditions, and guidance for applying the license to new programs.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
License Documentation
License.md
Added GPLv3 license text—preamble, definitions, sections 0–17, terms and conditions, and guidance for license application.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • This is a static legal document with no code logic, functional behavior, or runtime implications.

Poem

🐰 A license appears, the GPLv3 stands tall,
Free and open, it protects us all,
No code to review, just words that are clear,
Legal foundations are finally here! 📜✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Add GNU General Public License v3' directly and clearly describes the main change: adding a GPLv3 license file to the project.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
License.md (1)

10-10: Markdown heading style inconsistency (optional refactor).

The file uses ATX-style headings (##, ###) throughout, but markdownlint expects setext-style headings (underlined with === or ---). If your project's markdown style guide prefers setext headings, convert the ATX headings accordingly. This is a stylistic preference and can be deferred or skipped if consistency with the rest of the codebase is not critical.

Also applies to: 66-66, 68-68, 105-105, 142-142, 164-164, 178-178, 190-190, 219-219, 299-299, 353-353, 377-377, 387-387, 410-410, 471-471, 482-482, 491-491, 513-513, 523-523, 534-534, 544-544

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a125cf and a19dbcf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • License.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
License.md

[style] ~19-~19: To make your writing flow more naturally, try moving ‘also’ before the verb.
Context: ...ic License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by ...

(ALSO_PLACEMENT)


[style] ~173-~173: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...by exercising rights under this License with respect to the covered work, and you disclaim any ...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)


[style] ~253-~253: Consider using only “public” to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...ce of the work are being offered to the general public at no charge under subsection 6d. A se...

(GENERAL_XX)


[style] ~363-~363: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... the violation by some reasonable means prior to 60 days after the cessation. Moreover,...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)


[style] ~369-~369: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ight holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days after your receipt of the notic...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)


[style] ~379-~379: Consider a more concise word here.
Context: ...are not required to accept this License in order to receive or run a copy of the Program. A...

(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)


[style] ~380-~380: To make your writing clearer, consider a shorter, more direct phrase.
Context: ...tion of a covered work occurring solely as a consequence of using peer-to-peer transmission to rece...

(AS_A_CONSEQUENCE_OF)


[style] ~420-~420: To make your writing clearer, consider a shorter, more direct phrase.
Context: ...ude claims that would be infringed only as a consequence of further modification of the contributor...

(AS_A_CONSEQUENCE_OF)


[uncategorized] ~460-~460: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...conveying the work, and under which the third party grants, to any of the parties who would...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


[style] ~465-~465: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...nt, or that patent license was granted, prior to 28 March 2007. Nothing in this License...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)


[style] ~475-~475: ‘So as to’ expresses purpose and is used in formal texts. Consider using “to”.
Context: ...se. If you cannot convey a covered work so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations...

(SO_AS_TO)


[style] ~583-~583: This phrase is redundant (‘I’ stands for ‘interface’). Use simply “GUI”.
Context: ...am's commands might be different; for a GUI interface, you would use an “about box”. You sho...

(ACRONYM_TAUTOLOGY)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
License.md

10-10: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


66-66: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


68-68: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


105-105: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


142-142: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


164-164: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


178-178: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


190-190: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


219-219: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


299-299: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


353-353: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


377-377: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


387-387: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


410-410: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


471-471: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


482-482: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


491-491: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


513-513: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


523-523: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


534-534: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)


542-542: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


544-544: Heading style
Expected: setext; Actual: atx

(MD003, heading-style)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
License.md (2)

1-595: Verify the purpose and scope of adding the GPLv3 license.

This PR adds the full GPLv3 license text as a documentation file. Before merging, clarify:

  1. Is this intended to be the project's primary license, or a supplementary reference?
  2. Should a LICENSE file (without .md extension) be created instead, following common convention?
  3. Has the LICENSE file actually been applied to the codebase (via headers, SPDX identifiers, etc.), or is this documentation only?

Adding a license file has repository-wide legal and compliance implications—ensure this change aligns with the project's licensing strategy.


1-595: License content is authentic and correct.

The GPLv3 text (version 29 June 2007) matches the official GNU General Public License. The structure, definitions, terms, and guidance sections are all accurate and complete. No modifications to the license text itself are needed.

==========================

_Version 3, 29 June 2007_
_Copyright © 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. &lt;<http://fsf.org/>&gt;_
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix HTML entity encoding in URLs.

Lines 5 and 588 contain HTML-encoded angle brackets (&lt; and &gt;) that should be literal < and > characters in a markdown file. This encoding may cause markdown renderers to display the entities literally instead of rendering the URLs correctly.

Apply this diff to fix the encoding:

-_Copyright © 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. &lt;<http://fsf.org/>&gt;_
+_Copyright © 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <http://fsf.org/>_

And similarly for line 588:

-&lt;<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html>&gt;.
+<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html>.

Also applies to: 588-588

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In License.md around lines 5 and 588, the URL angle brackets are HTML-encoded as
&lt; and &gt;; replace those entities with literal '<' and '>' characters so the
URLs are wrapped with <http://fsf.org/> (and the corresponding URL on line 588)
to ensure proper Markdown link rendering; update both occurrences to use literal
angle brackets and save the file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant