Fix return type diagnostic conditions#30
Merged
Dreamescaper merged 2 commits intomainfrom May 19, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates the return-type validation for CustomHandler methods by broadening the condition and aligning the diagnostic message.
- Refactored the diagnostic message to reference the “first parameter” instead of “‘this’ parameter”
- Removed the extension-method-only guard in the return-type check
- Aligned the generator logic to always validate non-void return types against the first parameter
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| ServiceScan.SourceGenerator/DiagnosticDescriptors.cs | Updated the WrongReturnTypeForCustomHandler message to refer to “first parameter type.” |
| ServiceScan.SourceGenerator/DependencyInjectionGenerator.ParseMethodModel.cs | Removed the method.IsExtensionMethod check so the return-type diagnostic applies universally. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)
ServiceScan.SourceGenerator/DiagnosticDescriptors.cs:58
- [nitpick] The diagnostic message could be more precise by saying “type of its first parameter,” for example:
"Method with CustomHandler must return void or the type of its first parameter".
"Method with CustomHandler must return void or first parameter type",
ServiceScan.SourceGenerator/DependencyInjectionGenerator.ParseMethodModel.cs:87
- Add unit tests for CustomHandler methods to verify behavior both when they are extension methods and when they are not, ensuring the new return-type logic works as intended.
if (!method.ReturnsVoid &&
ServiceScan.SourceGenerator/DependencyInjectionGenerator.ParseMethodModel.cs:87
- Dropping the
IsExtensionMethodguard makes this check fire on all methods, which may incorrectly flag non-extension CustomHandler methods. Consider scoping it back to extension methods or explicitly attributed handlers.
if (!method.ReturnsVoid &&
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.