Skip to content

Merge v1.70.0 into Develop#4784

Closed
aslam-quad wants to merge 3 commits intodevelopfrom
main
Closed

Merge v1.70.0 into Develop#4784
aslam-quad wants to merge 3 commits intodevelopfrom
main

Conversation

@aslam-quad
Copy link
Contributor

Submission Checklist

NOTE: Community submissions can take up to 2 weeks to be reviewed.

Please take the following actions before submitting this pull request.

  • Fork your PR branch from the Toolkit "develop" branch (not main)
  • Test all changes with pre-commit in a local branch #
  • Confirm that "make tests" passes all tests
  • Add or modify unit tests to cover code changes
  • Ensure that unit test coverage remains above 80%
  • Update all applicable documentation
  • Follow Cluster Toolkit Contribution guidelines #

@aslam-quad aslam-quad requested review from a team and samskillman as code owners October 24, 2025 08:51
@aslam-quad aslam-quad added the release-chore To not include into release notes label Oct 24, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @aslam-quad, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request performs a routine version update, merging v1.70.0 into the develop branch. The changes primarily involve incrementing the version number across the HPC Toolkit's command-line interface and its associated Terraform modules. This ensures consistency in version reporting and metadata for all components.

Highlights

  • Version Update: The primary change in this pull request is the update of the HPC Toolkit's internal version string from v1.69.0 to v1.70.0.
  • Module Metadata: Numerous Terraform versions.tf files across various modules have been updated to reflect the new v1.70.0 in their provider_meta.google.module_name attributes.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the version from v1.69.0 to v1.70.0 across numerous Go and Terraform files, which appears to be part of the release process for v1.70.0. The changes are consistent and straightforward. My review includes suggestions to improve maintainability by centralizing the version number. This would make future releases less error-prone and easier to manage. Otherwise, the changes are correct for the version bump.

@aslam-quad aslam-quad requested a review from arpit974 October 24, 2025 09:42
@mufaqam-gcl mufaqam-gcl self-requested a review October 24, 2025 12:29
@rachit-google rachit-google self-requested a review October 24, 2025 12:39
@rachit-google
Copy link
Contributor

/gcbrun

@aslam-quad aslam-quad closed this Oct 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-chore To not include into release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants