Skip to content

Conversation

@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

For now, just to demonstrate what it would take to drop AbstractFFTs, ref #77. If we take this route, then we might want to consider other adjustments as discussed in #77. I think it will also make it easier to set up documentation for our methods.

@andreasnoack andreasnoack marked this pull request as draft January 7, 2026 20:02
@andreasnoack andreasnoack force-pushed the an/realreal branch 3 times, most recently from aeaae2f to 655cc5f Compare January 7, 2026 21:01
Base automatically changed from an/realreal to main January 7, 2026 21:22
@dannys4 dannys4 mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2026
@andreasnoack andreasnoack force-pushed the an/noabstract branch 2 times, most recently from e7295ba to 7c1b982 Compare January 9, 2026 12:52
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.09%. Comparing base (fb6c2fb) to head (2cae769).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #79      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.04%   98.09%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files           4        5       +1     
  Lines         409      419      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits          401      411      +10     
  Misses          8        8              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants