Skip to content

Update faqs 20250922 Geographic metadata FAQ & fix typos#14

Open
DeondeJager wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
Update-FAQs-20250922
Open

Update faqs 20250922 Geographic metadata FAQ & fix typos#14
DeondeJager wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
Update-FAQs-20250922

Conversation

@DeondeJager
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@DeondeJager DeondeJager requested a review from jfy133 September 22, 2025 09:58
Copy link
Contributor

@jfy133 jfy133 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good as first pass! Mostly maybe consider removing a bit of the detail that is already in the term itself, and give examples with the aDNA specific implementation

Updated geography FAQ by removing some details and adding an example.
@DeondeJager DeondeJager requested a review from jfy133 January 12, 2026 10:11
Copy link
Contributor

@jfy133 jfy133 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Additional minor comments

_TODO_

## How to fill in geographic metadata
There are two primary ways of providing the geographic location of a sample with existing MIxS terms: `Geographic location (latitude and longitude)` and `Geographic location (country and/or sea,region)`. Both of these are required fields and we suggest filling in at both terms with as precise information as possible. There is also a third term that is specific to the ancient DNA MInAS checklist, `Name of site or location where sample was originated`, which should be used to record the name of the archaeological/palaeontological site.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
There are two primary ways of providing the geographic location of a sample with existing MIxS terms: `Geographic location (latitude and longitude)` and `Geographic location (country and/or sea,region)`. Both of these are required fields and we suggest filling in at both terms with as precise information as possible. There is also a third term that is specific to the ancient DNA MInAS checklist, `Name of site or location where sample was originated`, which should be used to record the name of the archaeological/palaeontological site.
There are two primary ways of providing the geographic location of a sample with existing MIxS terms: `Geographic location (latitude and longitude)` and `Geographic location (country and/or sea,region)`.
Both of these are required fields and we suggest filling in at both terms with as precise information as possible.
There is also a third term that is specific to the ancient DNA MInAS checklist, `Name of site or location where sample was originated`, which should be used to record the name of the archaeological/palaeontological site.


_TODO_
- **Geographic location (latitude and longitude)**:
- The MIxS term [`Geographic location (latitude and longitude)`](https://genomicsstandardsconsortium.github.io/mixs/0000009/) is used to record the coordinates in decimal degrees, limited to 8 decimal points and separated by a single whitespace (e.g. `-39.27774231 175.61028236`). While limited to 8 decimal points, you will rarely need such precision, unless you've extracted DNA from a [specific grain of sand](https://xkcd.com/2170/). See [here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_degrees) to guide your decision on the appropriate level of precision to report.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The grain of sand thing should maybe go as a footnote using [^1] and [^1]: description syntax

Need to rewrite this FAQ once site location terms have been added (see MIxS-MInAS/extension-ancient#45 (comment))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants