Enhance repository configuration and documentation #53
Conversation
- Implement a deny-all `/*` strategy for enhanced security - Selectively un-ignore essential files and directories with `!` - Add explicit sections and documentation for clarity - Include an explicit deny list for sensitive directories This whitelist approach provides a secure-by-default configuration, preventing the accidental commit of sensitive files or local configurations. It improves repository hygiene and may enhance Git's performance by optimising traversal patterns. Signed-off-by: Marjo van Lier <marjo.vanlier@gmail.com>
- Update package description to highlight performance optimisations - Add detailed explanations for all script descriptions - Upgrade development dependencies to their latest versions This enhances the package's discoverability by clearly communicating its high-performance features. The improved script descriptions clarify the purpose of each development tool. Updating dependencies ensures better stability and access to the latest features from our development toolchain. Signed-off-by: Marjo van Lier <marjo.vanlier@gmail.com>
- Add Performance Benchmarks section with ops/sec metrics - Revamp Features section to highlight O(n) optimisations - Expand Testing section with Docker-based workflow - Restructure Table of Contents for improved navigation - Update introduction to reflect high-performance positioning These changes transform the README into a compelling showcase of the library's technical excellence. The new benchmarks provide quantifiable proof of the recent 2-5x speed improvements, addressing developer concerns about efficiency. The enhanced testing documentation builds credibility, whilst the restructured content improves the overall developer experience. Signed-off-by: Marjo van Lier <marjo.vanlier@gmail.com>
- Adjust .gitignore to stop ignoring the `.github` directory - Ensures inclusion of GitHub-specific workflows or configurations in version control This change improves repository consistency by allowing essential `.github` files to be tracked.
Change /* to * in .gitignore to properly implement whitelist approach. The /* pattern only denies root-level items, allowing subdirectory files to be inadvertently tracked. The * pattern correctly denies all files and directories throughout the repository, ensuring true whitelist behaviour where only explicitly allowed files are tracked. This critical security fix prevents accidental commits of sensitive files that may exist in subdirectories, strengthening the repository's security posture by enforcing comprehensive file denial by default. Signed-off-by: Marjo van Lier <marjo.vanlier@gmail.com>
- Enable auto approval when review effort is ≤4 - Enable auto approval when code suggestions tool finds no issues - Remove manual approval requirement for qualifying PRs - Maintain security and effort labeling for transparency This allows Qodo Merge to automatically approve PRs that meet quality thresholds, streamlining the review process whilst maintaining code quality standards through automated analysis. Signed-off-by: Marjo van Lier <marjo.vanlier@gmail.com>
Move auto approval settings to [config] section per official docs: - Enable auto approval for PRs with review effort ≤3 - Enable manual approval via /review auto_approve comments - Enable auto approval when improve tool finds no suggestions - Add self-review checkbox for PR authors This aligns with Qodo Merge official documentation structure and ensures auto approval features function correctly. Signed-off-by: Marjo van Lier <marjo.vanlier@gmail.com>
- Add English language configuration for consistent output - Disable output of relevant configurations to reduce noise - Add ticket label filtering to skip draft and wont-fix PRs - Improve configuration organisation with section comments Enhances Qodo Merge workflow by providing cleaner output and better PR filtering capabilities. The ticket filtering prevents unnecessary reviews on draft or abandoned work. Signed-off-by: Marjo van Lier <marjo.vanlier@gmail.com>
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughRepository housekeeping and metadata updates: a deny-by-default .gitignore reorganization, expanded PR automation in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor Dev as Developer
participant GH as GitHub
participant App as PR App/Action
participant PRA as pr_agent
participant Rev as pr_reviewer
participant CS as code_suggestions
Dev->>GH: Open/Update PR
GH->>App: Trigger (PR event)
App->>PRA: auto_review (configured)
PRA->>Rev: Run review (automatic_review=true)
Rev->>Rev: Compute review effort (max=4), generate findings
alt No suggestions AND effort low AND auto_approval enabled
Rev-->>GH: Approve PR (comment/label)
else Suggestions or higher effort
Rev-->>GH: Post review comments (persistent_comment)
PRA->>CS: demand_code_suggestions_self_review?
CS-->>GH: Post code suggestions (if enabled)
end
Note over GH,App: handle_push_trigger=true
Dev->>GH: Push new commits
GH->>App: Trigger (push)
App->>PRA: Re-run auto_review flow
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
Status, Documentation and Community
|
|
Claude finished @MarjovanLier's task —— View job PR Review Complete ✅Reviewed PR #53: "Enhance repository configuration and documentation" Review Checklist
Security Review
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @MarjovanLier, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the repository's configuration and documentation. It introduces a more secure .gitignore using a whitelist approach, improves developer experience with comprehensive README updates including performance benchmarks showcasing 2-5x speed improvements, and configures Qodo Merge for intelligent PR auto-approval. Additionally, package metadata in composer.json has been updated to reflect these enhancements and dependency versions.
Highlights
- Security Enhancement: Converted .gitignore to a secure whitelist pattern, preventing accidental commits of sensitive files.
- Documentation Improvement: Added detailed performance benchmarks to README.md highlighting 2-5x speed improvements and enhanced testing documentation.
- Automation Configuration: Configured Qodo Merge in .pr_agent.toml for intelligent PR auto-approval, streamlining the review workflow.
- Package Metadata Update: Updated composer.json with an enhanced description reflecting O(n) optimizations and revised development dependency versions.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
Changelog updates: 🔄 2025-08-23 *Added
Changed
Fixed
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #53 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 97.87% 97.87%
Complexity 40 40
=========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 94 94
=========================================
Hits 92 92
Misses 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR enhances repository configuration, documentation, and automation by converting security patterns, adding performance documentation, and configuring automated PR workflows.
- Updated .gitignore security model, comprehensive documentation with performance benchmarks, and automated PR approval configuration
- Enhanced package metadata with detailed descriptions and updated dependency versions
- Improved testing documentation structure with Docker recommendations and quality assurance details
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| composer.json | Updated package description with performance claims and dependency version bumps |
| README.md | Added performance benchmarks table and comprehensive testing documentation |
| .pr_agent.toml | Configured Qodo Merge auto-approval settings and review parameters |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
| *Benchmarks measured on standard development environments. Actual performance may vary based on hardware, string length, | ||
| and complexity.* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The performance benchmarks table presents specific operations per second without indicating the test environment, hardware specifications, or input data characteristics. These metrics could be misleading without proper context about benchmark conditions.
| *Benchmarks measured on standard development environments. Actual performance may vary based on hardware, string length, | |
| and complexity.* | |
| *Benchmarks measured on the following environment: Intel Core i7-9700K CPU @ 3.60GHz, 16GB RAM, Windows 10 Pro, PHP 8.1. Test strings were 100–200 characters in length, containing a mix of accented and unaccented Latin characters. Actual performance may vary based on hardware, PHP version, string length, and input complexity.* |
| *Benchmarks measured on standard development environments. Actual performance may vary based on hardware, string length, | ||
| and complexity.* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The term 'standard development environments' is vague and doesn't provide sufficient detail for reproducible benchmarks. Consider specifying actual hardware specifications, PHP version, and test data characteristics used for these measurements.
| *Benchmarks measured on standard development environments. Actual performance may vary based on hardware, string length, | |
| and complexity.* | |
| *Benchmarks measured on the following environment: Intel Core i7-9700K CPU @ 3.60GHz, 16GB RAM, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, PHP 8.2.6.* | |
| *Test data consisted of randomly generated UTF-8 strings (lengths 10–1000 characters) and typical name/date samples. Actual performance may vary based on hardware, string length, and complexity.* |
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
||||||||||||||
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly enhances the repository's configuration and documentation. The move to a whitelist .gitignore is a great security improvement, and the README.md and composer.json updates provide much better information for developers. I have one suggestion for the .gitignore file to make the whitelisting even more secure by being more specific about allowed file types in the src and tests directories.
… security Make whitelist patterns more specific by changing: - !src/** → !src/**/*.php - !tests/** → !tests/**/*.php This prevents accidental commits of temporary files, local configs, or other unwanted content in source directories. Co-authored-by: Marjo <MarjovanLier@users.noreply.github.com>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
composer.json (1)
45-46: PHP constraint is effectively “>=8.3.0” and unintentionally allows PHP 9
">=8.3.0|>=8.4.0"simplifies to>=8.3.0. If you intend to support only 8.x, use caret ranges to avoid auto-admitting 9.x when it lands.- "php": ">=8.3.0|>=8.4.0" + "php": "^8.3 || ^8.4"
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
README.md (5)
18-24: Benchmark claims need reproducibility and scope clarificationsGreat to see the 2–5× figures, but please add:
- hardware/OS, PHP version, extensions, and ini flags (e.g., JIT, Xdebug/PCOV)
- baseline and commit/Tag used for “before vs after”
- the tool (phpbench/in-house) and command to run
- a link/path to the benchmark script(s)
This keeps the claim auditable and avoids future drift.
Apply this doc tweak to add a “Benchmark methodology” subsection:
@@ ## Performance Benchmarks @@ - efficiently: + efficiently: @@ | `nameFix()` | **246,197+ ops/sec** | Consolidated regex operations | -*Benchmarks measured on standard development environments. Actual performance may vary based on hardware, string length, -and complexity.* +*Benchmarks measured on a standard dev machine. Actual performance varies with hardware, string length, and complexity.* + +#### Benchmark methodology +- Tooling: phpbench (or equivalent), reproducible scripts in `benchmarks/`. +- Environment: PHP 8.3.x, JIT: on/off (state it), Xdebug/PCOV: off for perf runs. +- Command: `composer bench` (document exact command). +- Baseline: commit/tag ABCDEF vs current HEAD.Also applies to: 55-67
208-216: Use modern Docker Compose invocationPrefer
docker compose(v2) over the deprecateddocker-compose. Provide both if you want to support older environments.-# Run complete test suite -docker-compose run --rm test-all +# Run complete test suite +docker compose run --rm test-all @@ -# Run individual test suites -docker-compose run --rm test-phpunit # PHPUnit tests -docker-compose run --rm test-phpstan # Static analysis -docker-compose run --rm test-code-style # Code style -docker-compose run --rm test-infection # Mutation testing +# Run individual test suites +docker compose run --rm test-phpunit # PHPUnit tests +docker compose run --rm test-phpstan # Static analysis +docker compose run --rm test-code-style # Code style +docker compose run --rm test-infection # Mutation testingAlso applies to: 211-216
231-243: Fix markdownlint issues and align coverage claim with tooling
- Remove trailing punctuation in heading.
- Adjust nested list indentation to 2 spaces.
- The doc claims “100% code coverage”, but
composer test:phpunitis run with--no-coverage. Either (a) soften the claim or (b) add a coverage-enabled script and reference it.-### Our Quality Suite Includes: +### Our Quality Suite Includes - **PHPUnit**: 166 comprehensive tests with 100% code coverage ensuring functional correctness + - Tip: run the coverage-enabled suite if you need coverage artifacts. @@ - - PHPStan (level max, strict rules) - - Psalm (level 1, 99.95% type coverage) - - Phan (clean analysis results) - - PHPMD (mess detection) + - PHPStan (level max, strict rules) + - Psalm (level 1, 99.95% type coverage) + - Phan (clean analysis results) + - PHPMD (mess detection)Option A (doc softening):
-- **PHPUnit**: 166 comprehensive tests with 100% code coverage ensuring functional correctness +- **PHPUnit**: 166 comprehensive tests (high coverage; full coverage available via the coverage suite) ensuring functional correctness
246-251: “Enabled declare(strict_types=1)” is not a system requirementThis is a code directive applied per file, not something users must “enable” globally. Suggest moving to a “Coding Standards”/“Development Practices” section or drop it.
-- **Enabled `declare(strict_types=1);`** for robust type safety
37-52: Consistency check: British vs American EnglishYou use “Optimisation/Standardises” (UK) throughout. That’s fine—ensure it’s consistent across README and composer.json to avoid mixed tone.
.gitignore (3)
20-38: Allow-lists look solid; consider .dist variants and fixturesTo avoid accidental exclusion of common config/fixtures, consider allowing typical “.dist” files and data under src/tests.
!*.php !composer.json !LICENSE +!phpunit.xml.dist +!phpcs.xml.dist +!phpstan.neon.dist +!psalm.xml.dist +!phpmd.xml.dist +!pint.json.dist +!infection.json5.dist
39-58: GitHub and CI blocks are good; add .editorconfig (optional)If you use EditorConfig for consistent formatting, unignore it explicitly.
!.github/ !.github/** !.pre-commit-config.yaml !.codacy.yaml +!.editorconfig
84-90: Minor: commit template filenameIf you rely on a commit message template, ensure
.gitmessageis indeed the configured path (git config commit.template .gitmessage). Otherwise, consider documenting or removing..pr_agent.toml (2)
47-73: Push-time auto-review block is aggressive; scope itRunning auto-review on every push can spam threads and consume CI minutes. Consider enabling only on PR open/reopen or when labeled.
-handle_push_trigger = true +handle_push_trigger = false
21-28: Keep extra_instructions consistent across push commandYour push
auto_reviewsets--pr_reviewer.extra_instructions='', which overrides the global concise/actionable guidance. Unless intentional, remove that override.- --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions='' \ + --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions='Please ensure comments are concise and actionable.' \composer.json (4)
48-57: Prefer caret constraints for dev tools to avoid unintended major bumpsUsing
>=may pull breaking majors over time. For reproducible CI, prefer caret ranges on known good versions.- "infection/infection": ">=0.31.2", - "laravel/pint": ">=1.24.0", - "phan/phan": ">=5.5.1", + "infection/infection": "^0.31.2", + "laravel/pint": "^1.24.0", + "phan/phan": "^5.5.1", @@ - "phpstan/phpstan": ">=2.1.22", - "phpstan/phpstan-strict-rules": ">=2.0.6", + "phpstan/phpstan": "^2.1.22", + "phpstan/phpstan-strict-rules": "^2.0.6", @@ - "rector/rector": ">=2.1.4", + "rector/rector": "^2.1.4",Also applies to: 59-62
102-106: Align coverage claims with scriptsDocs claim 100% coverage, but
test:phpunitdisables coverage. Either soften the doc (see README comment) or add a coverage-enabled script and reference it from README."scripts": { @@ - "test:phpunit": "phpunit --no-coverage --no-logging", + "test:phpunit": "phpunit --no-coverage --no-logging", + "test:phpunit-coverage": "XDEBUG_MODE=coverage phpunit --coverage-text --coverage-clover=coverage.xml",Also applies to: 71-75
77-81: Post-update commands may be noisy/slow in CIRunning
composer outdated -Don everycomposer updatecan slow pipelines and add noise. Consider moving to a separate CI job or guard with an env flag.- "composer outdated -D" + "if [ -n \"$CI_OUTDATED\" ]; then composer outdated -D; fi"
3-3: Keep language variant consistent with READMEREADME uses UK English (“Optimisation”). Mirror that in the description for consistency or switch both to US—just be consistent.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.gitignore(1 hunks).pr_agent.toml(2 hunks)README.md(3 hunks)composer.json(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-22T11:48:00.116Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: MarjovanLier/StringManipulation#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-22T11:48:00.116Z
Learning: Applies to src/**/*.php : Use PSR-4 namespace MarjovanLier\StringManipulation for source code
Applied to files:
README.mdcomposer.json
📚 Learning: 2025-08-22T11:48:00.116Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: MarjovanLier/StringManipulation#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-22T11:48:00.116Z
Learning: Applies to {src,tests}/**/*.php : Adhere to PSR standards enforced by Laravel Pint (preset "per")
Applied to files:
composer.json
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[grammar] ~7-~7: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...es](#features) - Performance Benchmarks - Installation - [Usage](#...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~8-~8: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...#performance-benchmarks) - Installation - Usage - [Advanced Usage](#advan...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~9-~9: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...- Installation - Usage - Advanced Usage - [Test...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~10-~10: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ion) - Usage - Advanced Usage - [Testing & Quality Assurance](#testing--q...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~11-~11: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ed-usage) - Testing & Quality Assurance - [System Requirements](#system-requirement...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~12-~12: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...uality-assurance) - System Requirements - Contributing - [Support]...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~13-~13: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...s](#system-requirements) - Contributing - Support ## Introduction Wel...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~19-~19: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...is now 2-5x faster, making it one of the most powerful and reliable solutions...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~22-~22: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...rsion, and validation with comprehensive testing and quality assurance. [![Packa...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~39-~39: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...g faster than ever (981,436+ ops/sec). - searchWords(): Transforms strings into a search-optim...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~42-~42: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ve search accuracy (387,231+ ops/sec). - nameFix(): Standardises names by capitalising let...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~45-~45: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ormatting at scale (246,197+ ops/sec). - utf8Ansi(): Convert UTF-8 encoded characters to th...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~47-~47: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ating compatibility with legacy systems. - isValidDate(): Comprehensive date validation utility ...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~49-~49: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ats and validates logical consistency. - Comprehensive Unicode/UTF-8 Support: B...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~56-~56: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ty to handle high-volume data processing efficiently: | Method | Perf...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~59-~59: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... | Optimisation Technique | |-------------------|-------------------...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~60-~60: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...-----|---------------------------------| | removeAccents() | **981,436+ ops/sec...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~61-~61: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ec** | Hash table lookups with strtr() | | searchWords() | **387,231+ ops/sec...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~62-~62: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ec** | Single-pass combined mapping | | nameFix() | **246,197+ ops/sec...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~65-~65: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...y vary based on hardware, string length, and complexity.* **Key Optimisation Fea...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~70-~70: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...mplexity algorithms for all core methods - Static caching for character mapping tab...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~71-~71: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...tic caching for character mapping tables - Single-pass string transformations - Min...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~72-~72: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...les - Single-pass string transformations - Minimal memory allocation in critical pa...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~199-~199: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ously tested using a comprehensive suite of tools to ensure stability and correct...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~204-~204: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...r Docker setup includes PHP 8.3 with all required extensions: ```bash # Run comp...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~233-~233: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...coverage ensuring functional correctness - Mutation Testing: 88% Mutation Score I...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~235-~235: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ng our tests are robust and meaningful - Static Analysis: Proactive bug detecti...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~240-~240: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...is results) - PHPMD (mess detection) - Code Style: Automated formatting with ...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~241-~241: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...tting with Laravel Pint (PSR compliance) - Performance Benchmarks: Continuous per...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~248-~248: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...onalisation and advanced Unicode support - Enabled declare(strict_types=1); for...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~249-~249: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...rict_types=1);`** for robust type safety - Composer for package management ## Su...
(QB_NEW_EN)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
231-231: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
237-237: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
238-238: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
239-239: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
240-240: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: guardrails/scan
- GitHub Check: build (8.4)
- GitHub Check: build (8.3)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.gitignore (3)
8-16: Whitelist pattern is correctly structuredGood job flipping to a deny-by-default with
*and restoring traversal via!*/. This avoids the common “cannot descend into dirs” trap.
95-106: Re-ignoring vendor/node_modules after the allowlist is correctPlacing these ignores after the
!*.phprule ensures dependencies remain ignored even if they contain PHP files.
120-130: Sensitive/AI tooling ignore listLooks intentional. Just confirm no essential build assets live under these directories, as the whitelist will otherwise drop them from commits.
User description
Summary
This PR enhances repository configuration and documentation with several key improvements:
• Security Enhancement: Convert .gitignore to secure whitelist pattern preventing accidental commits
• Documentation: Add comprehensive performance benchmarks showcasing 2-5x speed improvements
• Automation: Configure Qodo Merge for intelligent PR auto-approval
• Package Metadata: Update composer.json with enhanced descriptions and dependency versions
Key Changes
Security & Configuration
*+ explicit allows)Documentation & Metadata
Quality Assurance
Testing
Impact
PR Type
Enhancement, Documentation
Description
Add Qodo Merge auto-approval configuration for PR automation
Convert .gitignore to secure whitelist pattern for enhanced security
Add comprehensive performance benchmarks showcasing 2-5x speed improvements
Update composer.json with enhanced package descriptions and dependency versions
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
.pr_agent.toml
Configure Qodo Merge auto-approval settings.pr_agent.toml
README.md
Add performance benchmarks and enhance documentationREADME.md
composer.json
Enhance package metadata and update dependenciescomposer.json
performance
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores