[Readme] Add citation to AIAA SciTech Forum 2026 paper

[tryuan99]

This PR updates the README.md to include a citation to the AIAA SciTech Forum 2026 paper on the simulator published here: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2026-0750.

[stacklane-pr-stack-visualizer]

🧱 Stack PR · Base of stack

Stack Structure:

• [Readme] Add citation to AIAA SciTech Forum 2026 paper #192 titan/citation ← YOU ARE HERE

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a citation section to the README.md file, providing a BibTeX entry for users who wish to cite this work. The change is straightforward and helpful. I have one suggestion to improve the formatting of the BibTeX block for better readability.

[coderabbitai]

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A "Citation" section was added to README.md containing a BibTeX entry for a publication. The change is purely documentation-focused with no modifications to code logic, functionality, or exported declarations. Fifteen lines were added to the file.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding a citation to an AIAA SciTech Forum 2026 paper to the README.md file.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is directly related to the changeset, providing context about the citation being added (AIAA SciTech Forum 2026 paper) and including a reference link.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0918860 and 1d6442e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

51-64: LGTM! Citation section is well-formatted.

The citation section has been properly added with:

• Clear heading and introductory text
• Correctly formatted BibTeX code block with language specifier
• Complete and syntactically correct BibTeX entry with all required fields

All formatting concerns from previous reviews have been addressed.

_{✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents

In `@README.md`:
- Around line 54-63: The BibTeX block beginning with
`@inproceedings`{yuan26simulator needs a blank line before the fenced code block
and a language specifier for syntax highlighting; update the snippet to have an
empty line preceding the opening fence and change the fence to ```bibtex, and
also verify the DOI 10.2514/6.2026-0750 (or remove/annotate it) before merging.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f9f764 and 0918860.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

README.md

54-54: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD031, blanks-around-fences)

---

54-54: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Test plugins on windows-latest
• GitHub Check: Build plugins for windows-latest

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

51-53: LGTM! Clear and appropriate citation section.

The citation section is well-placed at the end of the README with clear introductory text.

_{✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.}