Skip to content

Comments

Heat source varying temperatures#167

Closed
Jaimepatt wants to merge 322 commits intoProject-OMOTES:masterfrom
Multi-Energy-Systems-Optimization:heat_source_varying_temp
Closed

Heat source varying temperatures#167
Jaimepatt wants to merge 322 commits intoProject-OMOTES:masterfrom
Multi-Energy-Systems-Optimization:heat_source_varying_temp

Conversation

@Jaimepatt
Copy link

This will allow a producer to have a variable supply temperature. If the carrier that is assigned to the out port of the producer has a profile assigned to it, the supply temperature will be forced to follow this temperature profile. This for now only works for cases where the temperature losses option is turned off.

FJanssen-TNO and others added 26 commits February 10, 2025 14:16
Updated the heatexchanger heat_to_discharge constraints such that is also working for the bypass when variable temperature are picked on either side of the heat exchanger. This includes a temporary fix for a big_m which is set to infinite when temperature options are available and source is connected with logical link.
* Add exception for NaNs in profile source files
* Add NaN check for influxDB profiles
Update casadi to 3.6.7 gil release with highs 1.4.1
* Pipe DN none bug fix in grow_workflow
* upgrade trctools version
* temporary fix for dependencies
Automatically creates documentation for the pycml assets on the variables that are created for them using a decorator that checks for the add_variable method in the assets and its parents.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sebastiaan la Fleur <sebastiaan@lfse.nl>
Include discounted cost documentation, correct documentation typos, and edit some parts of the financial documentation to improve clarity.
Added states to all asset parameters and started automatic documentation on the modifiers created by esdl_heat_model.
reset POTENTIAL_ERRORS in the grow_workflow
* only fix pandapower dependency issue in test environment
…ould always be on. Added warning for too low temperature on esdl carrier
…bably a constraints in the pipe discharge stuff.
@Jaimepatt
Copy link
Author

@FJanssen-TNO the PR we were discussing earlier.

@Jaimepatt Jaimepatt closed this Aug 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants