Revert "Better handle building rocSPARSE with ROC-TX (#484)" (#511)

[jsandham]

This reverts commit eb9b5cd. See original PR #484 for why we must revert. In short we cannot add another Findxxx.cmake module.

[TorreZuk]

Not clear what you are doing here. Assuming you were originally trying to resolve broken builds for community, much like reported in rocBLAS ROCm/rocBLAS#1579 , so at this point you are causing a revert back to broken builds, so do you have a replacement ready to PR (could add in same PR) ? @rkamd can be consulted as involved in rocblas side.

[jsandham]

Not clear what you are doing here. Assuming you were originally trying to resolve broken builds for community, much like reported in rocBLAS ROCm/rocBLAS#1579 , so at this point you are causing a revert back to broken builds, so do you have a replacement ready to PR (could add in same PR) ? @rkamd can be consulted as involved in rocblas side.

We were told by stella this needs to be reverted as the current approach is not acceptable. See here comment on here #484. In short we cannot add another Findxxx.cmake module.

I was going to try and spend part of today seeing if I could come up with something else. She pointed to looking at what MIopen does which I think is similar to what you guys are doing with using find_path to look for the header files and the roctx shared library. So I was going to maybe go back to what you guys are doing in rocblas.