Conversation
|
Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉 |
|
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughIntroduces a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GHA as GitHub Actions
participant Action as build-docker Action
participant Registry as Image Registry
participant Artifacts as Artifact Storage
participant Runner as CI Job Runner
rect rgb(200,220,255)
Note over Action: publish-image = true (amd64)
GHA->>Action: invoke build (arch=amd64, publish-image=true)
Action->>Action: compute DIGEST from /tmp/meta.json
Action->>Action: derive FULL_IMAGE, inspect image
Action->>Action: save manifest to /tmp/manifests/...
Action->>Artifacts: upload manifest artifact
Action->>GHA: output manifest JSON
end
rect rgb(255,230,200)
Note over Action: publish-image = false (amd64)
GHA->>Action: invoke build (arch=amd64, publish-image=false)
Action->>Action: extract image name from compose file
Action->>Action: save image as tar in /tmp/docker-images
Action->>Artifacts: upload docker-image tar artifact
end
rect rgb(220,255,220)
Note over Runner: Downstream workflows (E2E/CI)
Runner->>Artifacts: download image artifact(s)
Runner->>Runner: load tarballs into Docker daemon
Runner->>Runner: run tests using loaded images
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~50 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Disabled knowledge base sources:
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (1)📓 Common learnings⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #38030 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 70.62% 70.64% +0.01%
===========================================
Files 3143 3143
Lines 108684 108684
Branches 19546 19579 +33
===========================================
+ Hits 76762 76783 +21
+ Misses 29919 29893 -26
- Partials 2003 2008 +5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
4 issues found across 3 files
Prompt for AI agents (all issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them.
<file name=".github/actions/build-docker/action.yml">
<violation number="1" location=".github/actions/build-docker/action.yml:160">
P1: Condition mismatch: upload step will fail for arm64 when `publish-image == 'false'`. The save step only runs for `amd64`, but the upload step runs for all architectures. Add `&& inputs.arch == 'amd64'` to match the save step condition.</violation>
</file>
<file name=".github/workflows/ci.yml">
<violation number="1" location=".github/workflows/ci.yml:328">
P1: The `publish-image` condition is missing the release and develop branch cases. For non-PR events (releases, develop pushes), `github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name` will be empty, so images won't be published to the registry.</violation>
<violation number="2" location=".github/workflows/ci.yml:633">
P1: Incorrect boolean logic due to operator precedence. The `||` should be `&&` to properly negate the original condition. Currently, any non-develop branch (including internal PR branches) will incorrectly try to download artifacts instead of using the registry.</violation>
</file>
<file name=".github/workflows/ci-test-e2e.yml">
<violation number="1" location=".github/workflows/ci-test-e2e.yml:141">
P1: Operator precedence issue in condition. Due to `&&` binding tighter than `||`, this evaluates as `(fork PR && not release) || (not develop)`, making it TRUE for all non-develop branches including internal PRs. This would cause internal feature branch PRs to fail trying to download non-existent Docker artifacts. Consider using parentheses to clarify intent, e.g., `github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name != github.repository` for just external PRs, or add parentheses around the full condition.</violation>
</file>
Since this is your first cubic review, here's how it works:
- cubic automatically reviews your code and comments on bugs and improvements
- Teach cubic by replying to its comments. cubic learns from your replies and gets better over time
- Ask questions if you need clarification on any suggestion
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
661-665: Consider using the shared enterprise license fromrelease-versionsoutput.There's a hardcoded
ENTERPRISE_LICENSE_RC1here whileneeds.release-versions.outputs.enterprise-licenseis defined at line 37 (with an expiry note of 2026-07-01). Having two separate license values increases maintenance burden and risk of inconsistency.If the federation tests require a different license, consider adding a comment explaining why. Otherwise, consider reusing the shared output:
ENTERPRISE_LICENSE_RC1: ${{ needs.release-versions.outputs.enterprise-license }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/actions/build-docker/action.yml.github/workflows/ci-test-e2e.yml.github/workflows/ci.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: cubic · AI code reviewer
- GitHub Check: 📦 Build Packages
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/ci-test-e2e.yml (1)
138-164: LGTM on the image loading mechanism.The download and load flow is well-structured: downloading tarballs from artifacts, loading them into Docker, and cleaning up. The pattern matching for CE vs EE builds is appropriate.
.github/actions/build-docker/action.yml (2)
122-139: Manifest handling for publish flow looks correct.The conditional branching properly handles the publish case: computing the service suffix for coverage images, extracting the digest, and saving the manifest for later multi-arch assembly.
141-157: LGTM on the image save mechanism.The approach of saving Docker images to tarballs for artifact upload is appropriate for fork PRs where registry secrets aren't available.
.github/workflows/ci.yml (3)
315-328: LGTM on the publish-image flag pattern.The conditional
publish-image: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository }}cleanly determines whether to publish to the registry (internal PRs) or save as artifacts (fork PRs).
667-680: LGTM on failure logging.Adding conditional log output for
rc1-prebuilt,hs1, andmongoon failure aids debugging and follows the pattern established in E2E tests.
457-459: LGTM on image size tracking condition.Skipping image size tracking for fork PRs is appropriate since images aren't published to the registry in that scenario.
ggazzo
added
the
stat: QA assured
dionisio-bot
bot
added
the
stat: ready to merge
|
/backport 7.13.3 |
|
Sorry, I couldn't do that backport because of conflicts. Could you please solve them? you can do so by running the following commands: after that just run |
|
/backport 7.13.3 |
|
Pull request #38130 added to Project: "Patch 7.13.3" |
3 participants
Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)
Issue(s)
Steps to test or reproduce
Further comments
Summary by CodeRabbit
Note: No end-user visible feature changes.
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.