Conversation
This reverts commit ed9260f.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not the kind of input you are asking for, but this seems like a tight boundary. I'd expand to at least 400, probably even 440, as the upper bound
There was a problem hiding this comment.
and this one is a little aggressively low - tighten up a bit. 200-230 is probably the set of bounds you want here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why include this one if you are running conventional semen instead of sexed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1?! wowie you are very optimistic haha. maybe 0.6 would be a better upper limit, or 0.7 if you really want to push it in the adult herd.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
probably reasonable to expand this to 30
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why keep these so small? don't they impact nutrient requirements of the cows? some cows walk 0.25-0.5 miles to the parlor on dry lot dairies
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hehe, I wondered what ME was :) makes perfect sense now!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If there's no linked issue to this, either the issue should be created or the comment should be deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you're trying to catch division by zero error here. that could be more specific in the except statement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there a particular reason for leaving this here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| intnames = [str(x).replace("(", "") for x in intnames] | |
| intnames = [str(x).replace(")", "") for x in intnames] | |
| intnames = [str(x).replace(",", "*") for x in intnames] | |
| intnames = [str(x).replace(" ", "") for x in intnames] | |
| trans_table = str.maketrans({"(": "", ")": "", ",": "*", " ": ""}) | |
| intnames = [str(x).translate(trans_table) for x in intnames] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| # print(a) | |
| for i in a: | |
| # print(i) | |
| for i in a: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| pass |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using str.startwith() is a lot safer to check if it actually starts with a particular pattern.
Context
Issue(s) closed by this pull request: closes #
How big are the changes in the PR? Would you nominate it for a major version upgrade?
What
Why
How
Test plan