Fixing an issue that type 'null' is not assignable to validateStatus …#8
Fixing an issue that type 'null' is not assignable to validateStatus …#8MitchLewis930 wants to merge 1 commit intopr_028_beforefrom
Conversation
…xios#2773) Co-authored-by: Xianming Zhong <chinesedfan@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Jay <jasonsaayman@gmail.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
Comment |
|
@CodeRabbit full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@index.d.ts`:
- Line 65: The type for validateStatus is wrong: it currently defines a function
that returns boolean|null but should allow the entire property to be null;
change the signature for validateStatus so the union applies to the property
(i.e., ((status: number) => boolean) | null) instead of ((status: number) =>
boolean | null), updating the declaration named validateStatus in index.d.ts so
callers can assign null to the property itself.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
index.d.ts
✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.
| onUploadProgress?: (progressEvent: ProgressEvent) => void; | ||
| onDownloadProgress?: (progressEvent: ProgressEvent) => void; | ||
| maxContentLength?: number; | ||
| validateStatus?: ((status: number) => boolean | null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! Type signature correctly allows null return value.
The change properly expands the return type to boolean | null, which fixes the type error when users return null from their validateStatus implementation. The parentheses correctly scope the union type to the return value.Important: The type signature should be ((status: number) => boolean) | null rather than ((status: number) => boolean | null). The current implementation parses as a function that returns boolean | null, but the intended fix should allow the entire property to be set to null.
According to Axios documentation, validateStatus can be assigned a function, undefined, or null to the property itself. When set to null or undefined, all status codes resolve the promise.
🐛 Proposed fix for the type signature
- validateStatus?: ((status: number) => boolean | null);
+ validateStatus?: ((status: number) => boolean) | null;This was also noted in the original Axios PR discussion where the same mistake was made and later corrected in PR #3200.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| validateStatus?: ((status: number) => boolean | null); | |
| validateStatus?: ((status: number) => boolean) | null; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@index.d.ts` at line 65, The type for validateStatus is wrong: it currently
defines a function that returns boolean|null but should allow the entire
property to be null; change the signature for validateStatus so the union
applies to the property (i.e., ((status: number) => boolean) | null) instead of
((status: number) => boolean | null), updating the declaration named
validateStatus in index.d.ts so callers can assign null to the property itself.
PR_028
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.