Skip to content

Fixing defaults to use httpAdapter if available (#1285)#9

Open
MitchLewis930 wants to merge 1 commit intopr_029_beforefrom
pr_029_after
Open

Fixing defaults to use httpAdapter if available (#1285)#9
MitchLewis930 wants to merge 1 commit intopr_029_beforefrom
pr_029_after

Conversation

@MitchLewis930
Copy link

@MitchLewis930 MitchLewis930 commented Jan 29, 2026

PR_029

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved environment detection to more reliably choose the correct network adapter for Node vs. browser contexts, ensuring consistent HTTP behavior across runtimes.

* Fixing defaults to use httpAdapter if available
* Use a safer, cross-platform method to detect the Node environment
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 961ecd1 and 0b3db5d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/defaults.js
🔇 Additional comments (1)
lib/defaults.js (1)

18-24: The webpack configuration already mitigates this concern.

The existing webpack setup (node: { process: false } in webpack.config.js) explicitly sets process to false in browser bundles, preventing the condition typeof process !== 'undefined' from ever being true for browser builds. Combined with the "browser" field in package.json that maps the HTTP adapter to the XHR adapter, the current adapter selection logic is already protected against false-positive Node detection. The runtime check serves as a fallback for edge cases (unbundled code, other runtimes) where these bundler-level protections don't apply.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The getDefaultAdapter logic in lib/defaults.js was reordered to perform a stricter Node environment detection first (typeof process !== 'undefined' plus Object.prototype.toString.call(process) === '[object process]'), with browser XHR adapter selection evaluated only if the Node check fails.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Adapter Selection Logic
lib/defaults.js
Reordered environment detection: Node check now requires both typeof process !== 'undefined' and the "[object process]" class check before falling back to browser XHR adapter selection.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

🐰 I hopped through lines of code so neat,
I nudged Node's check to make it meet,
Now Node is asked with clearer eyes,
The browser waits its calm surprise,
A tiny hop for adapter peace.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: reordering environment detection to prioritize the httpAdapter selection when available in the Node.js process check.
Merge Conflict Detection ✅ Passed ✅ No merge conflicts detected when merging into pr_029_before

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch pr_029_after

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@MitchLewis930
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@MitchLewis930
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 15, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant