Skip to content

Comments

doc:LRP skipRedirectFromBackend with per packet LB#2

Open
MitchLewis930 wants to merge 1 commit intopr_042_beforefrom
pr_042_after
Open

doc:LRP skipRedirectFromBackend with per packet LB#2
MitchLewis930 wants to merge 1 commit intopr_042_beforefrom
pr_042_after

Conversation

@MitchLewis930
Copy link

@MitchLewis930 MitchLewis930 commented Jan 30, 2026

User description

PR_042


PR Type

Documentation


Description

  • Update LRP skipRedirectFromBackend documentation

  • Clarify support for both socket-based and per-packet load-balancing


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["skipRedirectFromBackend Feature"] -- "Previously: socket-based LB only" --> B["Updated Documentation"]
  A -- "Now: socket-based + per-packet LB" --> B
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Documentation
local-redirect-policy.rst
Clarify skipRedirectFromBackend LB support scope                 

Documentation/network/kubernetes/local-redirect-policy.rst

  • Updated documentation to clarify skipRedirectFromBackend support scope
  • Changed from "only supported with socket-based load-balancing" to
    "supported with socket-based load-balancing and per packet based
    load-balancing"
  • Maintains existing requirement for SO_NETNS_COOKIE feature in Linux
    kernel >= 5.8
+1/-1     

Update the added support for
LRP skipRedirectFromBackend with
per packet based LB.

Signed-off-by: Praveen Krishna <pkrishn@google.com>
@qodo-code-review
Copy link

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants