refactor: update system message for TogetherCrew bot

[amindadgar]

• Revised the system message to clarify the bot's role as a router and lightweight answerer.
• Adjusted instructions for handling generic questions, emphasizing concise answers and the preference for returning 'rag' when context is needed.
• Improved clarity by removing redundant phrases and ensuring directness in response guidelines.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Refined the assistant’s internal guidance to improve consistency and clarity in responses.
  • Simplified wording around handling generic questions, follow-ups, and uncertainty.
  • Preserved existing features, routing behavior, and placeholder usage; no functional changes expected for end-users.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Refactors the system prompt text within hivemind_activity in temporal_tasks.py, adjusting wording about bot description, scope, handling generic questions, follow-ups, and uncertainty. No logic, API, or routing changes; no public interfaces altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Prompt text refactor temporal_tasks.py	Updated system prompt wording for hivemind_activity; removed “strict,” simplified scope guidance, rephrased rules for generic questions, follow-ups, and uncertainty. No code flow or interface changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

I twitch my whiskers, nibble lines of prose—
A prompt made neat, where careful meaning grows.
No gears were moved, no routes re-spun,
Just tidier words beneath the sun.
Thump-thump! says rabbit, merging light—
A softer script, still sharp and bright.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the main change, which is a refactor of the system message for the TogetherCrew bot, and it aligns directly with the updates made to the prompt text without introducing unrelated details.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feat/answer-based-llm-knowledge

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0d3fa2 and d309fbe.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• temporal_tasks.py (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: ci / test / Test

🔇 Additional comments (1)

temporal_tasks.py (1)

32-39: No routing tests found; verify behavior
I didn’t find tests covering the updated routing logic in temporal_tasks.py—please manually verify or add tests to ensure the router still correctly chooses between ‘rag’ and direct answers.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[amindadgar]

Not improving the system. Closing the PR

related eval: https://github.com/TogetherCrew/hivemind-bot/actions/runs/18271494922