Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves modifications to several Data Transfer Object (DTO) classes across different modules. The primary change is the removal of the Changes
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/eas/dto/sign-delegated-revocation.dto.ts (1)
14-14: Remove duplicate decoratorThe
@IsString()decorator is already present above.-@IsString() readonly siweJwt: string;src/eas/dto/sign-delegated-attestation.dto.ts (1)
14-14: Remove duplicate decoratorThe
@IsString()decorator is already present above.-@IsString() readonly siweJwt: string;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/discourse-verification/dto/generate-verification-token.dto.ts(1 hunks)src/eas/dto/decrypt-attestation-secret.dto.ts(2 hunks)src/eas/dto/sign-delegated-attestation.dto.ts(2 hunks)src/eas/dto/sign-delegated-revocation.dto.ts(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Lint
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/discourse-verification/dto/generate-verification-token.dto.ts (1)
14-16: Verify JWT validation strategyThe removal of
@JwtProvider(AUTH_PROVIDERS.SIWE)suggests a change in JWT validation strategy. Please confirm:
- Where is the SIWE JWT validation now handled?
- Is this part of a broader architectural change?
Also, there appears to be a duplicate
@IsString()decorator which can be removed.@IsString() @IsNotEmpty() -@IsString() // @JwtProvider(AUTH_PROVIDERS.SIWE) readonly siweJwt: string;✅ Verification successful
Removal of @JwtProvider is acceptable, duplicate decorator should be removed
The SIWE JWT validation is properly handled in the SiweService using cryptographic verification via the Viem library's
verifySiweMessage. The@JwtProviderdecorator only performed basic provider claim checking and its removal doesn't weaken security.Please remove the duplicate
@IsString()decorator as suggested:@IsString() @IsNotEmpty() -@IsString() // @JwtProvider(AUTH_PROVIDERS.SIWE) readonly siweJwt: string;🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for JwtProvider decorator implementation and usage ast-grep --pattern '@JwtProvider($$$)' # Search for SIWE-related code rg -l "SIWE" --type ts # Search for JWT validation related code rg -l "JwtProvider|validateJwt|jwtValidation" --type ts # Look for auth-related configuration fd -e ts -e js "auth\..*config"Length of output: 746
Script:
#!/bin/bash # View JWT provider decorator implementation cat src/shared/decorators/jwt-provider.decorator.ts # Check SIWE service validation logic cat src/auth-siwe/siwe.service.ts # View auth configuration cat src/auth/config/auth.config.ts # View discourse verification controller to understand the flow cat src/discourse-verification/discourse-verification.controller.tsLength of output: 5272
src/eas/dto/decrypt-attestation-secret.dto.ts (1)
14-16: Document validation strategy changeThe removal of
@JwtProvidervalidation across multiple DTOs suggests an architectural change. Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining why the JWT provider validation was removed
- Updating relevant documentation/ADRs
Also, the duplicate
@IsString()decorator can be removed.@IsString() @IsNotEmpty() -@IsString() // @JwtProvider(AUTH_PROVIDERS.SIWE) readonly siweJwt: string;src/eas/dto/sign-delegated-attestation.dto.ts (2)
Line range hint
14-24: Clarify JWT validation requirementsThis DTO accepts both
siweJwtandanyJwt. With the removal of@JwtProvidervalidation:
- What distinguishes these two JWT types now?
- Should they have different validation rules?
1-1: Consider broader implications of validation changesThe consistent removal of
@JwtProvidervalidation across multiple DTOs raises some architectural considerations:
- Security: Ensure JWT validation is properly handled elsewhere in the codebase
- Documentation: Update architecture docs to reflect this change in validation strategy
- Testing: Verify that existing tests cover the new validation flow
Would you like me to help verify any of these aspects?
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
siweJwtproperties across different data transfer objects