Skip to content

fix: enable the declaration#192

Merged
Behzad-rabiei merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix-tsconfig
Jan 26, 2025
Merged

fix: enable the declaration#192
Behzad-rabiei merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix-tsconfig

Conversation

@Behzad-rabiei
Copy link
Member

@Behzad-rabiei Behzad-rabiei commented Jan 26, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated TypeScript compiler configuration to generate declaration files for improved type support and compatibility with other projects.
    • Removed outdated version entry and feature description from the changelog.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request includes modifications to the tsconfig.json file, where the TypeScript compiler option for generating declaration files has been changed from false to true. This adjustment enables the automatic creation of .d.ts files during compilation, enhancing the type definitions for the project. Additionally, a section in the CHANGELOG.md file documenting version 3.2.0 of the mongo-lib project has been removed, which included details about a feature update related to user schema modifications.

Changes

File Change Summary
tsconfig.json Updated TypeScript compiler option to enable generation of declaration (.d.ts) files
CHANGELOG.md Removed version entry for 3.2.0 and feature description regarding user schema and interface update

Poem

🐰 Declarations rise, types take flight!
From false to true, a compiler's delight
.d.ts files dancing with glee
Type safety springs, now wild and free
A rabbit's code, more clear and bright! 🌈


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2f9a12 and f879116.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: ci / test / Test
  • GitHub Check: ci / lint / Lint

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
tsconfig.json (1)

Fix incorrect patterns in tsconfig.json include/exclude arrays

The current configuration has two issues:

  • The test directory pattern ./__test__/**/* doesn't match the actual directory __tests__
  • .eslintrc.json is listed but doesn't exist in the repository

Suggested fix:

  "include": ["./src/**/*", "./__tests__/**/*", "jest.config.ts"],
  "exclude": ["./__tests__/**/*", "jest.config.ts"]
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 18-19: Verify the include/exclude patterns.

There appears to be a conflict in the file patterns where test files are both included and excluded. This could lead to unexpected behavior.

Let's analyze the impact:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for .d.ts files that might be generated for test files
echo "Analyzing potential declaration file generation for test files..."

# List all TypeScript files in __test__ directory
echo "TypeScript files in __test__ directory:"
fd -e ts -p "__test__"

# Check if the directory structure exists
echo -e "\nChecking if dist/__test__ exists (where declarations would go):"
fd -t d "dist/__test__"

Length of output: 419


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all directories first level
echo "Directory structure (first level):"
fd -t d -d 1

# Find all test files regardless of location
echo -e "\nAll test files:"
fd -e test.ts -e test.tsx -e spec.ts -e spec.tsx

# Check for config files
echo -e "\nConfig files:"
fd -e json -e ts -x basename {} \; | grep -E "eslintrc|jest.config"

Length of output: 782

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tsconfig.json (1)

13-13: LGTM! Enabling declaration files is beneficial.

Enabling declaration file generation is a good practice for TypeScript projects, especially if this code is intended to be consumed by other projects. This will provide better type information and improve IDE support for consumers.

Consider also adding these complementary options for better declaration file handling:

  • "declarationMap": true - Enables source maps for declaration files
  • "declarationDir": "./dist/types" - Organizes declaration files in a separate directory
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2bb88da and f2f9a12.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: ci / lint / Lint
  • GitHub Check: ci / test / Test

@Behzad-rabiei Behzad-rabiei merged commit 7703a57 into main Jan 26, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant