Skip to content

Conversation

@exKAZUu
Copy link
Member

@exKAZUu exKAZUu commented Dec 29, 2025

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @exKAZUu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on bringing the repository in line with 'willbooster' standards by both standardizing the development process and updating core dependencies. It introduces a detailed 'Development Workflow' across several documentation files, providing clear guidelines for code contributions, testing, and pull request procedures. Concurrently, a significant number of project dependencies have been upgraded to their latest versions, ensuring the repository benefits from the most recent features, bug fixes, and security enhancements. Additionally, the order of operations within the check-for-ai script has been refined for improved development efficiency.

Highlights

  • Standardized Development Workflow: A comprehensive 'Development Workflow' section has been introduced across key documentation files (.cursor/rules/general.mdc, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md). This new section provides detailed, step-by-step instructions for code changes, writing and fixing tests, committing with conventional messages, creating pull requests using gh, monitoring CI results, and addressing review comments.
  • Dependency Updates: Numerous npm and yarn dependencies have been updated to their latest patch or minor versions. This includes core development tools such as eslint, @types/node, various @typescript-eslint packages, rollup, sigstore, and vite, ensuring the project benefits from the latest features, bug fixes, and security enhancements.
  • Script Refinement: The check-for-ai script in package.json files has been modified to reorder its operations, now prioritizing yarn typecheck before yarn lint-fix --quiet for improved development efficiency.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

このプルリクエストは、リポジトリ全体で "willboosterify" を実行し、設定ファイル、開発ワークフロー、および依存関係を更新するものです。
主な変更点は以下の通りです。

  • AIエージェント向けの開発ワークフローの指示が更新され、より詳細で具体的な手順になりました。
  • check-for-ai スクリプトで typechecklint-fix の前に実行されるように順序が変更されました。これは型安全性を先に確認するための良い改善です。
  • eslint を含む多数の依存関係が更新されています。
  • コーディングスタイルガイドから noUncheckedIndexedAccess に関するルールが削除されました。これについては、潜在的なリスクがあるためレビューコメントを記載しました。

- Use stderr for logging debug messages temporarily since stdout output is sometimes omitted.
- When adding new functions or classes, define them below any functions or classes that call them to maintain clear call order.
- Prefer `undefined` over `null` unless explicitly dealing with APIs or libraries that require `null`.
- Always perform existence checks on array due to `noUncheckedIndexedAccess: true`.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

noUncheckedIndexedAccess: true のための配列存在チェックを推奨するルールが削除されています。

もし tsconfig.jsonnoUncheckedIndexedAccesstrue のままであれば、このルールを削除すると、開発者(またはAI)が配列アクセス時に undefined の可能性を考慮し忘れることで、ランタイムエラーを引き起こす危険性があります。

tsconfig.json の設定が false に変更されたのでなければ、このルールの削除は再検討することをお勧めします。

- Use stderr for logging debug messages temporarily since stdout output is sometimes omitted.
- When adding new functions or classes, define them below any functions or classes that call them to maintain clear call order.
- Prefer `undefined` over `null` unless explicitly dealing with APIs or libraries that require `null`.
- Always perform existence checks on array due to `noUncheckedIndexedAccess: true`.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

noUncheckedIndexedAccess: true のための配列存在チェックを推奨するルールが削除されています。

もし tsconfig.jsonnoUncheckedIndexedAccesstrue のままであれば、このルールを削除すると、開発者(またはAI)が配列アクセス時に undefined の可能性を考慮し忘れることで、ランタイムエラーを引き起こす危険性があります。

tsconfig.json の設定が false に変更されたのでなければ、このルールの削除は再検討することをお勧めします。

- Use stderr for logging debug messages temporarily since stdout output is sometimes omitted.
- When adding new functions or classes, define them below any functions or classes that call them to maintain clear call order.
- Prefer `undefined` over `null` unless explicitly dealing with APIs or libraries that require `null`.
- Always perform existence checks on array due to `noUncheckedIndexedAccess: true`.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

noUncheckedIndexedAccess: true のための配列存在チェックを推奨するルールが削除されています。

もし tsconfig.jsonnoUncheckedIndexedAccesstrue のままであれば、このルールを削除すると、開発者(またはAI)が配列アクセス時に undefined の可能性を考慮し忘れることで、ランタイムエラーを引き起こす危険性があります。

tsconfig.json の設定が false に変更されたのでなければ、このルールの削除は再検討することをお勧めします。

- Use stderr for logging debug messages temporarily since stdout output is sometimes omitted.
- When adding new functions or classes, define them below any functions or classes that call them to maintain clear call order.
- Prefer `undefined` over `null` unless explicitly dealing with APIs or libraries that require `null`.
- Always perform existence checks on array due to `noUncheckedIndexedAccess: true`.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

noUncheckedIndexedAccess: true のための配列存在チェックを推奨するルールが削除されています。

もし tsconfig.jsonnoUncheckedIndexedAccesstrue のままであれば、このルールを削除すると、開発者(またはAI)が配列アクセス時に undefined の可能性を考慮し忘れることで、ランタイムエラーを引き起こす危険性があります。

tsconfig.json の設定が false に変更されたのでなければ、このルールの削除は再検討することをお勧めします。

@exKAZUu exKAZUu merged commit c07d630 into main Dec 29, 2025
11 checks passed
@exKAZUu exKAZUu deleted the wbfy branch December 29, 2025 02:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants