Skip to content

Conversation

@dontirun
Copy link

@dontirun dontirun commented Jan 9, 2026

Resolves #668

There are quite a few things I'm not too sure about with this implementation (like the filtering logic or if I've properly tested it)

Comment on lines +693 to +700
metadata: meta,
fs: fs,
projectedSchema: t.meta.CurrentSchema(),
boundRowFilter: boundFilter,
caseSensitive: true,
rowLimit: -1, // No limit
concurrency: 1,
}
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if this is correct

@zeroshade
Copy link
Member

I'll give this a look to start reviewing, in the meantime can you fix the lint issues?

@twuebi
Copy link
Contributor

twuebi commented Jan 13, 2026

This requires the replacing table to match the schema of the replaced table, right?

Asking since I'm interested in something like replaceTransaction from Java which is used by CREATE OR REPLACE statements

@dontirun
Copy link
Author

This requires the replacing table to match the schema of the replaced table, right?

Yes

@zeroshade
Copy link
Member

The spark integration tests for overwrite don't seem to be passing

@dontirun
Copy link
Author

The spark integration tests for overwrite don't seem to be passing

I definitely didn't do those correctly, any guidance on whether they're structured fine or if I'm going about it the right way?

I couldn't figure out testing it locally

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat(Table): Overwrite functionality

3 participants