Add Polars to Parquet implementations #153
+141
−0
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ | ||
| engine_id: polars | ||
| last_updated: "2026-01-30" | ||
| support: | ||
| physical-boolean: | ||
| status: full | ||
| physical-int32: | ||
| status: full | ||
| physical-int64: | ||
| status: full | ||
| physical-int96: | ||
| status: read | ||
| physical-float: | ||
| status: full | ||
| physical-double: | ||
| status: full | ||
| physical-byte-array: | ||
| status: full | ||
| physical-fixed-len-byte-array: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-string: | ||
| status: full | ||
| logical-enum: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-uuid: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-int-types: | ||
| status: full | ||
| logical-decimal-int32: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-decimal-int64: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-decimal-byte-array: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-decimal-fixed-len-byte-array: | ||
| status: full | ||
| logical-float16: | ||
| status: full | ||
| logical-date: | ||
| status: full | ||
| logical-time-int32: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-time-int64: | ||
| status: full | ||
| logical-timestamp-int64: | ||
| status: full | ||
| logical-interval: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-json: | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Just wanted to check for JSON and BSON other engines do support this with the caveat that they just pass through. Does polars not support them at all? |
||
| status: none | ||
| logical-bson: | ||
| status: none | ||
| logical-variant: | ||
| status: none | ||
| logical-geometry: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-geography: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-list: | ||
| status: full | ||
| logical-map: | ||
| status: read | ||
| logical-unknown: | ||
| status: full | ||
| encoding-plain: | ||
| status: full | ||
| encoding-plain-dictionary: | ||
| status: read | ||
| encoding-rle-dictionary: | ||
| status: full | ||
| encoding-rle: | ||
| status: read | ||
| encoding-bit-packed: | ||
| status: none | ||
| encoding-delta-binary-packed: | ||
| status: read | ||
| encoding-delta-length-byte-array: | ||
| status: read | ||
| encoding-delta-byte-array: | ||
| status: read | ||
| encoding-byte-stream-split: | ||
| status: read | ||
| encoding-byte-stream-split-extended: | ||
| status: none | ||
| compression-uncompressed: | ||
| status: full | ||
| compression-brotli: | ||
| status: full | ||
| compression-gzip: | ||
| status: full | ||
| compression-lz4-deprecated: | ||
| status: none | ||
| compression-lz4-raw: | ||
| status: full | ||
| compression-lzo: | ||
| status: read | ||
| compression-snappy: | ||
| status: full | ||
| compression-zstd: | ||
| status: full | ||
| format-bloom-filters: | ||
| status: none | ||
| format-bloom-filter-length: | ||
| status: none | ||
| format-stats-min-max: | ||
| status: full | ||
| format-page-index: | ||
| status: read | ||
| format-page-crc32: | ||
| status: read | ||
| format-modular-encryption: | ||
| status: none | ||
| format-size-statistics: | ||
| status: read | ||
| format-data-page-v2: | ||
| status: read | ||
| api-parquet-summary-file: | ||
| status: none | ||
| api-sorting-columns: | ||
| status: read | ||
| api-rowgroup-pruning-stats: | ||
| status: full | ||
| api-rowgroup-pruning-bloom: | ||
| status: none | ||
| api-column-projection: | ||
| status: full | ||
| api-page-pruning-stats: | ||
| status: none | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we point to something like latest? I see that in the meantime 1.37.1 has been released in the meantime (which is great)!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that since this data is mostly used to derive this table, it is ok if it is not complete for all versions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alamb is correct, maybe we should try to rename this field? "baseline"? (this should be a follow-up)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coastalwhite just wanted to verify the X's match your expectation here (2024 I believe specifically had relatively minor changes). If you render the page, mousing over the X will tell you the missing features.