Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @GioLogist, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses ticket B3-2706 by implementing a targeted styling change to hide a specific header component within modal interfaces. The update involves modifying a CSS file to apply a Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a CSS override to hide a header element by targeting a new generated class name. While this fixes the issue, relying on generated class names is fragile and can lead to future maintenance problems. My review includes a suggestion to add comments to document these brittle selectors, which will help with future debugging.
| .b3-modal .css-1m9ejup, | ||
| .b3-modal .css-1cv2836 { | ||
| .b3-modal .css-1cv2836, | ||
| .b3-modal .css-1893pav { | ||
| display: none !important; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using generated class names like .css-1893pav is a fragile approach because they can change with any third-party library update, breaking this override. This creates technical debt.
To improve maintainability, please add comments explaining what each of these cryptic class names targets. This will be invaluable for future debugging. I've added a suggestion with placeholders for you to fill in.
| .b3-modal .css-1m9ejup, | |
| .b3-modal .css-1cv2836 { | |
| .b3-modal .css-1cv2836, | |
| .b3-modal .css-1893pav { | |
| display: none !important; | |
| } | |
| .b3-modal .css-1m9ejup, /* Targets: (please specify) */ | |
| .b3-modal .css-1cv2836, /* Targets: (please specify) */ | |
| .b3-modal .css-1893pav { /* Targets: (please specify) */ | |
| display: none !important; | |
| } |
B3-2706
Description
Update css class w new classname to hide header
Test Plan
Screenshots
For BE, include snippets, response payloads and/or curl commands to test endpoints
[FE] Before
[FE] After
[BE] Snippets/Response/Curl
automerge=false