Conversation
|
There are many logging libraries, the zerolog might be great lib but I’m not comfortable forcing the choice at this stage. What would a better approach be to introduce better loggings but not explicitly choosing the lib? |
|
The only reason why I used the zerolog lib was in order for testing. Therefore, if you like we can still use cron.Log interface to write a custom Logger without having to use any other log libraries. As of right now, I'm currently removing zerolog, and adding a default logger as soon as I am done I will PR. If you would like I can write the testcode while using multiple different logger libraries. What do you think? |
|
Almost the same can be achieved by using stdlib logger #22 - it is not structured but allows capturing all the library logs using any implementation. |
No description provided.