Skip to content

Conversation

@rebroad
Copy link
Contributor

@rebroad rebroad commented Feb 24, 2022

This combines #492, #483, #484, and #473 and also fixes #532 by adding the ability to change between graph durations without losing the data (it's sampled at each interval). Also added is some graphical animations when the X or Y scale changes. (it might be necessary to make this optional on lower performing hardware, such as the raspberry pi).

One more feature is that the graph will start on the smallest duration, and automatically increase the graph duration once the graph is filled.

Some examples can be seen in my comment at #539 (comment)

I'm expecting there may be issues with my coding style, so I'll create this PR as a draft at this stage.

@rebroad rebroad force-pushed the NetworkGraphImprovements branch from 3d282b5 to 8c56419 Compare February 24, 2022 21:13
@katesalazar
Copy link

katesalazar commented Feb 24, 2022 via email

@rebroad
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebroad commented Feb 24, 2022

What's the rationale for combining those PRs in this one?

Because they are difficult to separate - given they each kinda tread on the toes of the others, I thought better to PR the whole foot rather than the individual toes. e.g. more than one feature uses the y_value() function, the tool-tip change and the linear/non-linear change both need an extra commit to be able work together.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Feb 25, 2022

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.
A summary of reviews will appear here.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

  • #540 (network graph - show/hide panels based on window width/height by RandyMcMillan)
  • #483 (Make network graph slider easier to use by rebroad)
  • #473 (Enable a non-linear network traffic option (click to toggle between linear and non-linear) by rebroad)

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

@katesalazar
Copy link

katesalazar commented Sep 18, 2022 via email

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Oct 3, 2022

🐙 This pull request conflicts with the target branch and needs rebase.

Want to unsubscribe from rebase notifications on this pull request? Just convert this pull request to a "draft".

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Jan 1, 2023

There hasn't been much activity lately and the patch still needs rebase. What is the status here?

  • Is it still relevant? ➡️ Please solve the conflicts to make it ready for review and to ensure the CI passes.
  • Is it no longer relevant? ➡️ Please close.
  • Did the author lose interest or time to work on this? ➡️ Please close it and mark it 'Up for grabs' with the label, so that it can be picked up in the future.

@hebasto
Copy link
Member

hebasto commented Mar 27, 2023

Closing this due to lack of activity. Feel free to reopen.

@hebasto hebasto closed this Mar 27, 2023
@bitcoin-core bitcoin-core locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 26, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Needs rebase UI All about "look and feel" UX All about "how to get things done"

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Debug Window: Network Traffic cleared

5 participants