[WIP] The handleSqlSubmit function's Loading ResultSet... message seems to appear prematurely. Is there way to have it keep the Running your request... message until the fetch starts returning data? It seems to return rather quickly But I could be wrong abou...#2
Closed
[WIP] The handleSqlSubmit function's Loading ResultSet... message seems to appear prematurely. Is there way to have it keep the Running your request... message until the fetch starts returning data? It seems to return rather quickly But I could be wrong abou...#2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Coding agent has begun work on **The handleSqlSubmit function's Loading ResultSet... message seems to appear prematurely. Is there way to have it keep the Running your request... message until the fetch starts returning data? It seems to return rather quickly But I could be wrong about that:
** and will replace this description as work progresses.
See problem context
The following is a snapshot of a chat conversation between a user and an AI coding assistant. Prioritize later messages in the conversation.
User: Please explain this recommendation in more detail:
Optional cleanup: update package.json "name" to "db2json" (not required), and search for “restocking2” references (only found in package-lock.json name). No code paths use the old folder name, so the app should run as-is.
AI: This recommendation suggests two optional cleanup steps for your project:
AI: to "db2json":
AI: identifies your project. If your project folder or app is now called "db2json", it's a good idea (but not required) to make the "name" field match for clarity and consistency.
In summary: You can update the name in
AI: for neatness, and you don’t need to worry about “restocking2” unless you want to regenerate
AI: for consistency. The app will run as-is.
User: Okay, let's add all the necessary and usual json nodes to the package.json file for this db2json project as I will be pushing it to my github repo.
AI:
AI: Your
AI: now includes all the standard and recommended fields for a public GitHub project, such as name, version, description, main, repository, author, license, keywords, bugs, and homepage. Be sure to update the placeholder values (YOUR_GITHUB_USERNAME, YOUR NAME, YOUR_EMAIL@example.com) with your actual information before pushing to GitHub.
User: Create a readme.md and changelog.md with whatever we've done so far as a base line overview (not too many details)
AI: Both
AI: and
AI: have been created with a baseline overview of the project and its initial setup. You can now review or update these files as needed before publishing to GitHub.
User: You inserted "Added typescript build setup" but I don't see a typescript build setup. Is that just standard but we don't have it?
AI: You are correct—while the
AI: includes TypeScript as a devDependency and a build script ("build": "tsc"), there is no actual TypeScript source code or a
AI: configuration for a full TypeScript build setup in your project. The mention in the changelog refers only to the presence of TypeScript in package.json, not to a complete setup or usage of TypeScript source files.
If you want a real TypeScript build setup (with .ts files and a configured tsconfig.json), let me know and I can add it for you. Otherwise, I can update the changelog to clarify this.
User: Update the readme and changelog for clarity
AI:
AI:
AI: Both the readme and changelog have been updated for clarity. They now specify that TypeScript is included as a devDependency and build script, but there are no TypeScript source files yet. Let me know if you need further adjustments or want to add TypeScript support.
User: Will having the aliasmatch and script alias like this cause an issue with conflicts? What I want is for the CGI program db2json.pgm to be authorized but also allow them to integrate the html, js, and css into their current http server configuration.
AliasMatch ^/db2json/(.*) /www//docs/db2json/$1
ScriptAlias /db2json /qsys.lib/db2json.lib/db2json.pgm
<Location /db2json>
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Sign in with your IBM i profile"
UserID %%CLIENT%%
Require valid-user
PasswdFile %%SYSTEM%%
Options +ExecCGI +Includes
<Location /db2json>
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Sign in with your IBM i profile"
UserID %%CLIENT%%
Require valid-user
PasswdFile %%SYSTEM%%
AI: Yes, having both AliasMatch and ScriptAlias for the same path prefix (/db2json) can cause conflicts in Apache HTTP Server (including IBM i's HTTP server). Here’s why and how to address it:
What happens with your current config?
AliasMatch ^/db2json/(.*) ...maps any URL starting with /db2json/ to static files (HTML, JS, CSS) in your docs directory.ScriptAlias /db2json ...maps the exact path /db2json to your CGI program (db2json.pgm).Will there be a conflict?
How to achieve your goal?
Authorization
Example for your use case:
Summary:
Your current setup is standard and will not cause a conflict as long as you understand that /db2json (no slash) is for the CGI and /db2json/* is for static files. Use <LocationMatch ^/db2json$> if you want to restrict authentication to just the CGI program.
User: Explain that ^/db2json$ syntax and what it means vs just /db2json
AI: The syntax ^/db2json$ is a regular expression (regex) used in Apache’s directive. Here’s what it means:
So, ^/db2json$ matches only the exact path /db2json (with nothing before or after).
In contrast, /db2json (used in <Location /db2json>) matches /db2json and anything that starts with /db2json, such as /db2json/, /db2json/file, etc.
Use ^/db2json$ in when you want to apply settings (like authentication) only to the exact /db2json path (e.g., your CGI), not to files or directories under it.
User: I want to push this to my git hub but I have not create the db2json repo as yet. Do I need to go online and do that first before upload this ?
AI: You do not have to create the GitHub repo online first—there are two ways to do it:
If you want the easiest experience, create the repo on GitHub.com first, then follow the instructions it provides to push your local code. This ensures your remote and local repositories are linked correctly.
User: okay I created the repo named db2json on my page (user name is bobcozzi). can you review my package.json and tsconfig.json and make any necessary changes so I can add, commit and push this up there including the H, QCLSRC, and QCSRC folders along with their content?
AI:
AI: Your
AI: has been updated for GitHub best practices, including correct metadata and a files list to ensure H, QCLSRC, and QCSRC folders are included when publishing. The
AI: was also updated to clarify that no TypeScript files are present yet and to exclude non-TS folders.
You can now safely add, commit, and push your project—including the H, QCLSRC, and QCSRC folders—to your new GitHub repo. The warning in
AI: is expected since there are no .ts files yet; it will go away if you add TypeScript sources in the future.
User: This has both IBM i source code in the QCLSRC, QCSRC and H folders, as well as PC/html code in the project folder and js and css folders that all needs to be synced.
AI: Your project structure is well-suited for syncing both IBM i source code (in QCLSRC, QCSRC, and H) and PC/web code (in the root, js, and css folders) to GitHub. With the updated
AI: "files" field, all these directories and their contents will be included when you publish or push to your repo.
To keep everything in sync:
If you want, I can provide a step-by-step git workflow for your first commit and push. Let me know if you need that!
User: SO I do this?
git add .
git commit -m "Initial relase of Db2JSON"
git push
AI: Yes, those are the correct steps! Here’s the full workflow for your first push (assuming you already ran git init and set the remote):
If you haven’t set the remote yet, add it first:
You’re ready to push your project to GitHub!
User: It doesn't seem like it omitted the node_modules when I did the git commit
AI: A .gitignore file has been created to ensure node_modules and other common files are excluded from future commits. To fix your current commit, remove node_modules from the repo, commit the removal, and push again. Let me know if you want the exact commands for that process.
User: So do I do the commit again or what's the sequence to avoid including thse node_modules?
AI: To remove node_modules from your repo and prevent it from being committed again, follow these steps:
git commit -m "Remove node_modules from repository and add .gitignore"After this, node_modules will be ignored in future commits thanks to your .gitignore.
User: DO I want to do git push, or git push -u origin main
AI: If this is your first push to the remote repository or you want to set the upstream branch, use:
This sets the default upstream branch, so future pushes can be done with just git push.
If you’ve already set the upstream branch before, you can simply use:
For most first-time pushes, git push -u origin main is recommended.
User: CL prompter is another repo I have, why is this thing referring to it? Yikes! :)
To https://github.com/bobcozzi/clprompter.git
! [rejected] main -> main (fetch first)
error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/bobcozzi/clprompter.git'
hint: Updates were rejected because the remote contains work that you do
hint: not have locally. This is usually caused by another repository pushing
hint: to the same ref. You may want to first integrate the remote changes
hint: (e.g., 'git pull ...') before pushing again.
hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.
AI: Your local git repository is still linked to your clprompter remote (https://github.com/bobcozzi/clprompter.git), not your new db2json repo. That’s why you’re seeing this error.
To fix this:
This will connect your local project to the correct GitHub repository.
User: Now I see this. What does it mean?
git push -u origin main
To https://github.com/bobcozzi/db2json.git
! [rejected] main -> main (fetch first)
error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/bobcozzi/db2json.git'
hint: Updates were rejected because the remote contains work that you do
hint: not have locally. This is usually caused by another repository pushing
hint: to the same ref. You may want to first integrate the remote changes
hint: (e.g., 'git pull ...') before pushing again.
hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.
AI: This error means the remote db2json repository on GitHub already has commits (for example, a README or .gitignore created by GitHub) that your local repo does not have. Git is preventing you from overwriting those changes.
To fix this, you need to pull the remote changes and merge them into your local branch before pushing:
(The --allow-unrelated-histories flag is needed if your local and remote repos were initialized separately.)
Resolve any merge conflicts if prompted.
Then push again:
This will sync your local and remote repositories.
User: Yes I had it create a .gitignore when I did the repo. Probably a mistake.
AI: That’s a common situation and not a problem! When you create a repo on GitHub and let it add a .gitignore (or README), it creates an initial commit. This just means your local and remote histories are different.
To resolve this, simply run:
Then push your code:
After this, your local and remote repos will be in sync and you won’t have this issue again.
User: I see this after the git pull original main...
git pull origin main --allow-unrelated-histories
remote: Enumerating objects: 4, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (4/4), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done.
remote: Total 4 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 (from 0)
Unpacking objects: 100% (4/4), 4.54 KiB | 1.14 MiB/s, done.
From https://github.com/bobcozzi/db2json
hint: You have divergent branches and need to specify how to reconcile them.
hint: You can do so by running one of the following commands sometime before
hint: your next pull:
hint:
hint: git config pull.rebase false # merge
hint: git config pull.rebase true # rebase
hint: git config pull.ff only # fast-forward only
hint:
hint: You can replace "git config" with "git config --global" to set a default
hint: preference for all repositories. You can also pass --rebase, --no-rebase,
hint: or --ff-only on the command line to override the configured default per
hint: invocation.
fatal: Need to specify how to reconcile divergent branches.
AI: This message means your local and remote branches have different histories (diverged), and git needs to know how to combine them. You have two main options:
This will merge the remote changes into your local branch. If there are conflicts, resolve them, then commit.
This will replay your local commits on top of the remote branch.
For your case, use the merge option:
Then resolve any conflicts, commit, and push:
This will get your local and remote branches in sync.
User: I got this;
git pull --no-rebase origin main
From https://github.com/bobcozzi/db2json
fatal: refusing to merge unrelated histories
AI: You need to include the --allow-unrelated-histories flag to force git to merge two repositories that were initialized separately. Run:
This will allow the merge to proceed. If there are any conflicts, resolve them, then commit and push:
This will synchronize your local and remote repositories.
User: I got this:
git pull origin main --allow-unrelated-histories
From https://github.com/bobcozzi/db2json
hint: You have divergent branches and need to specify how to reconcile them.
hint: You can do so by running one of the following commands sometime before
hint: your next pull:
hint:
hint: git config pull.rebase false # merge
hint: git config pull.rebase true # rebase
hint: git config pull.ff only # fast-forward only
hint:
hint: You can replace "git config" with "git config --global" to set a default
hint: preference for all repositories. You can also pass --rebase, --no-rebase,
hint: or --ff-only on the command line to override the configured default per
hint: invocation.
fatal: Need to specify how to reconcile divergent branches.
AI: Git is asking you to specify how to combine the histories because both your local and remote branches have unique commits. To resolve this, run:
This will merge the remote and local histories.
If you see any merge conflicts, resolve them, then:
This will complete the sync between your local and remote repositories.
User: Is is asking me to enter a commit message and gives me that inline editor. Should I just type a simple message and then how do I exit? Is that the :q or similar /
AI: Yes, you should type a simple merge commit message (or just use the default message provided by git).
To exit and save in the default editor (usually Vim):
This will save the commit message and complete the merge. If you want to exit without saving, use :q! instead.
User: Now do those last 3 steps? add commit push?
AI: Yes! Now run these commands to finish the process:
This will stage any resolved files, commit the merge, and push everything to your GitHub repo. You’ll be fully synced after this.
User: I don't see anything in this github repo
Here's some of what I saw in terminal:
git push -u origin main
Enumerating objects: 5243, done.
Counting objects: 100% (5243/5243), done.
Delta compression using up to 14 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (4143/4143), done.
error: RPC failed; HTTP 400 curl 22 The requested URL returned error: 400
send-pack: unexpected disconnect while reading sideband packet
Writing objects: 100% (5242/5242), 24.29 MiB | 20.20 MiB/s, done.
Total 5242 (delta 1253), reused 3409 (delta 828), pack-reused 0
fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
Everything up-to-date
AI: This error means your push was too large for GitHub’s default HTTP limits (often due to node_modules or other large files accidentally included). Even though you now have a .gitignore, if node_modules was already committed, it’s still in your git history and being pushed.
To fix this:
git commit -m "Remove node_modules from repository"If the push still fails due to repo size, you may need to use a tool like git filter-repo or BFG Repo-Cleaner to remove node_modules from your git history. Let me know if you need help with that!
User: Okay, have this issue with ever new creation/repo. What can I set in vs code to avoid this from happening moving forward (if anything) and how do I resolve it now?
AI: To avoid this issue in the future and resolve it now, follow these steps:
1. Prevent the problem in new projects
AI: file before running
git add .or your first commit.AI: and other large/generated folders are listed in
AI: before you commit.
2. Fix your current repository
Since
AI: was already committed, you need to remove it from git history:
A. Remove node_modules from tracking and commit
git rm -r --cached node_modules git commit -m "Remove node_modules from repository" git push -u origin mainIf this works, you’re done.
B. If your push still fails (repo too large)
You’ll need to rewrite your git history to remove all traces of
AI: :
java -jar bfg.jar --delete-folders node_modules --no-blob-protection git reflog expire --expire=now --all && git gc --prune=now --aggressive git push --forceThis will permanently remove
AI: from your repo history.
Summary:
AI: before your first commit.
AI: from tracking and history if already committed.
Let me know if you want step-by-step help with BFG or have any questions!
User: First, the "outDir": "./dist", in tsconfig.json isn't applicable to this project. Can you remove it safely? I delete the dist folder
User: @agent Try Again
AI:
AI: The "outDir": "./dist" line has been safely removed from your tsconfig.json. You can also delete the dist folder if it exists, as it is no longer needed for this project.
User: Hmmm... same issue with 24.29MiB and a remote end hung up unexpectedly message. Right after I ran git push -u origin main
AI: This means your repository is still too large for GitHub to accept, likely because node_modules or other large files were committed in the past and are still present in your git history—even if you removed them now.
To resolve this, you need to remove node_modules (and any other large files) from your entire git history, not just the latest commit. Here’s how to do it safely:
1. Download and run BFG Repo-Cleaner (recommended for this situation)
Download BFG Repo-Cleaner:
https://rtyley.github.io/bfg-repo-cleaner/
In your project root, run:
git rm -r --cached node_modules git commit -m "Remove node_modules from repository"Run BFG to clean your history:
Clean and prune your repo:
Force push to GitHub:
After this, your repo will be much smaller and you should not see the error again.
Let me know if you want step-by-step help with BFG or if you have any questions!
User: When I ran git rm -r --cached node_modules
It said node_modules did not match any files
AI: This means node_modules is no longer tracked by git in your current working directory, which is good. However, if you previously committed node_modules, it may still exist in your repository’s history, causing the large push size.
To fully resolve the issue:
Quick steps with BFG Repo-Cleaner:
This will permanently remove node_modules from your git history and allow you to push to GitHub.
Let me know if you want detailed, step-by-step instructions for your platform!
User: I already have bgf up one level in my directory structure at /Users/cozzi/Downloads/projects/bfg-1.15.0.jar
AI: Great! Here are the exact steps to remove node_modules from your git history using BFG, given your setup:
AI: ), run:
This will permanently remove node_modules from your entire git history and allow you to push to GitHub successfully. Let me know if you hit any issues or need further help!
User: Weird. That java -jar bfgI says:
Aborting : /Users/cozzi/Downloads/projects/db2json is not a valid Git repository.
AI: This error means you are not running the BFG command inside the actual git repository directory. Make sure you are in the root of your git repo (where the .git folder exists).
Here’s how to check and fix:
cd /Users/cozzi/Downloads/projects/db2jsonYou should see a .git folder listed.
If you do not see a .git folder, you are not in the correct directory, or git was not initialized.
Let me know what you see, and I’ll guide you from there!
User: I don't see .git how do I initialize it?
AI: To initialize a git repository in your project folder, run:
cd /Users/cozzi/Downloads/projects/db2json git initThis will create a .git folder and set up your project as a git repository.
After that, you can add your remote and proceed with your normal git workflow. If you need to connect to your GitHub repo, run:
Let me know if you need help with the next steps!
User: It is using master as the name for the initial branch instead of main.
AI: To rename your initial branch from master to main, run these commands in your project directory:
If you haven’t pushed yet, you can just push with:
If the remote doesn’t have a main branch yet, this will create it.
This will align your local branch name with the standard main branch on GitHub.
User: git push -u origin main
To https://github.com/bobcozzi/db2json.git
! [rejected] main -> main (non-fast-forward)
error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/bobcozzi/db2json.git'
hint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind
hint: its remote counterpart. Integrate the remote changes (e.g.
hint: 'git pull ...') before pushing again.
hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.
AI: This error means the remote main branch has commits that your local main branch does not. To resolve this, you need to pull the remote changes and merge them into your local branch before pushing.
Run:
or, if you want to ensure a merge:
Resolve any merge conflicts if prompted, then:
This will synchronize your local and remote branches and allow you to push successfully.
User: git pull origin main --allow-unrelated-histories
From https://github.com/bobcozzi/db2json
hint: You have divergent branches and need to specify how to reconcile them.
hint: You can do so by running one of the following commands sometime before
hint: your next pull:
hint:
hint: git config pull.rebase false # merge
hint: git config pull.rebase true # rebase
hint: git config pull.ff only # fast-forward only
hint:
hint: You can replace "git config" with "git config --global" to set a default
hint: preference for all repositories. You can also pass --rebase, --no-rebase,
hint: or --ff-only on the command line to override the configured default per
hint: invocation.
fatal: Need to specify how to reconcile divergent branches.
cozzi@MacBookM4 db2json % git pull origin main --allow-unrelated-histories --no-rebase
From https://github.com/bobcozzi/db2json
Auto-merging .gitignore
CONFLICT (add/add): Merge conflict in .gitignore
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
AI: You have a merge conflict in your .gitignore file. Here’s how to resolve it:
Open
AI: in your editor.
Look for conflict markers like this:
Edit the file to keep what you want (combine or choose one side), and remove the conflict markers.
Save the file.
Stage the resolved file:
Complete the merge with a commit:
git commit -m "Resolve .gitignore merge conflict"Push your changes:
Your branches will be fully merged and in sync after this!
User: Finally
AI: Congratulations! Your local and remote repositories are now in sync. You’ve resolved the conflicts and completed the push. Your project is now safely on GitHub and ready for collaboration or backup.
If you have any more questions or need help with future git or project tasks, just ask!
User: Can you read and refresh my "## Best Test Case" section of the readme.md file and update it as needed or recommend edits?
User: @agent Try Again
AI: Here’s a refreshed and clarified version of your “## Best Test Case” section for the readme.md, with improved structure and clarity:
Best Test Case
The best way to try out DB2JSON is with a web CGI request. Use the provided
AI: file along with the supporting JavaScript and CSS files to run the demo app. This demo web page offers a simple interface, similar to IBM ACS RUN SQL Scripts, but is entirely web-driven—no Java or PC programs required, just HTML, JS, CSS, and the host CGI program
DB2JSONin theDB2JSONlibrary.To test via the web:
AI: in your browser. You can run SQL queries (SELECT, VALUES, or CTE) and see the JSON output directly in the browser.
To test via CL/5250:
DEMOCL program included inAI: . This program calls
DB2JSONfrom CL and writes the output ofQIWS/QCUSTCDTto the IFS as JSON.Usage notes:
Would you like me to update the file with this improved section?
User: yes looks good
AI:
AI: Your "Best Test Case" section has been updated for clarity and structure. It now clearly explains both web and CL/5250 testing, and highlights usage notes for new users. Let me know if you want further tweaks or have other documentation needs!
User: Great. The "## Build Routines" section of readme.md is correct but apparently I don't know ow to make sub-bullets. I used a., b., c. to do that and it is clearly not doing it right. Can you correct it and fix any spelling or grammer issues along the way?
AI:
AI: The "Build Routine" section now uses proper Markdown sub-bullets, and spelling/grammar have been corrected for clarity and professionalism. Your instructions are now easier to read and follow. Let me know if you need any more improvements!
User: okay, let's update the repo so this new readme it there.
AI: Your
AI: is already up to date in the repository—there are no new changes to commit or push. The latest version is already reflected on GitHub. If you make further edits, just repeat git add, commit, and push as needed.
User: now I've updated the qclsrc/demo.clle file and need to push it up. Should I just use the generica git add . or is specifying the specific file name better?
AI: Both methods work, but here’s the difference:
AI: will stage only that specific file.
If you only want to commit and push the changes to QCLSRC/DEMO.CLLE, it’s better to specify the file name:
git add QCLSRC/DEMO.CLLE git commit -m "Update demo CLLE program" git pushIf you want to include all changes you’ve made in the project, use:
Choose the method that matches your intent! Specifying the file is safer if you only want to push that one change.
User: can you create and run one of those cooler versions with the && in them to run it all in one "statement"
AI: The command ran, but there were no changes detected in
AI: to commit—only
AI: is currently modified. If you want to commit and push both files (or just BUILD.CLLE), let me know and I can run the appropriate command for you.
User: Weird because it now has 23 lines and before it had 12 so it was changed.
AI: That is odd. The most likely reasons are:
To troubleshoot:
AI: appears as modified, try:
git add QCLSRC/DEMO.CLLE git commit -m "Update demo CLLE program" git pushLet me know what git status reports, and I’ll help you resolve it!
User: It shows build.clle when I do git status.
But then this happens:
git commit -m "Update Build CL program"
On branch main
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/main'.
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add ..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore ..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: QCLSRC/BUILD.CLLE
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
AI: This means you haven’t staged the changes yet. You need to run git add before git commit. Here’s what to do:
git commit -m "Update Build CL program"After running git add, your commit will succeed.
User: Ah, finally. :) Thanks
AI: You’re welcome! Glad it’s all working now. If you have any more questions or need help with git, coding, or documentation, just ask. Happy coding! 🚀
User: Can I include a large video of using this app on my git up? I know about the "Upload files" thing and have used that, but will it allow video too?
AI: You can upload a video file (such as .mp4, .mov, etc.) to your GitHub repository using the "Upload files" feature, and GitHub will store it just like any other file. However, there are some important considerations:
Best practice:
Let me know if you want instructions for Git LFS or linking to an external video!
User: When the fetch has begun to receive data from the host cgi, can we show a message "Loading resultSet..." ? I think in the error area is a good place since it gets reset/cleared
AI:
AI: Now, when a fetch begins, the message "Loading resultSet..." will appear in the error area and clear automatically when the result is received or an error occurs. This gives users immediate feedback that the query is in progress.
User: I don't want it to appear until after the first fetch. Also now that I see this message before the first fetch, I'd like another message "Runing your request..." to appear upon the submit, and then the 2nd one "Loading resultSet..." after that first fetch
AI:
AI: Your UI will now show "Running your request..." immediately upon submit, then switch to "Loading resultSet..." after the fetch begins, and clear the message when the data is received or an error occurs. This provides clear, step-by-step feedback to the user.
User: The Running your request message appears, and then I want it to wait for the fetch to return as it beings creating and loading the table with that data. Then once the table is rendered the loading should be cleared.
Right now the way it works, it shows Running your request and then immediately switched to Loading ResultSet, then once the fetch starts it clears the message. Can we wait until the fetch starts, then issue Loading the resultSet, then when the table is cleared, clear the message?
AI:
AI: The last edit introduced a syntax error due to misplaced or missing braces. I will correct the structure so the try/catch block and function body are valid, and ensure the loading message logic works as intended.
AI:
AI: There is still a syntax issue, likely due to an extra or misplaced closing brace. I will carefully review and correct the function structure to resolve the error and ensure the loading messages work as intended.
AI: The error is due to an extra closing brace at the end of your handleSqlSubmit function. I will remove the duplicate catch block and ensure the function is syntactically correct, while keeping your intended loading message logic.
AI:
AI: The syntax issue is now fixed. Your loading messages will appear in the correct sequence:
You can now test the improved user feedback flow.
User: Sorry I mean to ask for when the table is full not when it is cleared. Is that what you inferred?
AI: Yes, I inferred that you want the loading message to be cleared after the table is fully rendered (i.e., when the data is loaded and displayed), not when the table is cleared or emptied.
With the current logic, the loading message ("Loading resultSet...") is cleared immediately after renderTable(json, resultsDiv);—which is when the table is filled with the new data. This matches your intent: the message disappears as soon as the results are shown to the user. If you want any further adjustment (such as waiting for a specific DOM event or animation), let me know!
User: in populateSqlHistoryDropdown, the elipse to the end of the sql statements when they are longer than 80 characters. I'm wondering if we can reduce the font size slightly and maybe wrap the SQL statement in the dropdown so each line is variing size and shows up to 400 chacacters wordwrapped to the active width of the drop down itself?
AI: HTML elements in a dropdown do not support word wrapping or custom font sizes per option—text is always rendered on a single line, and long text is truncated with an ellipsis by the browser. This is a browser limitation. Alternatives: You can reduce the font size of the entire dropdown using CSS (but not per option). For true word-wrapping and multi-line display, you would need to replace the with a custom dropdown built from a styled
/- elements, which is more complex.
Quick improvement:
You can set a smaller font size for the dropdown and increase its width, but the options will still not wrap. Here’s a CSS snippet you can add to your stylesheet:
Summary: