update LICENSE and COC links#458
Open
zkamvar wants to merge 1 commit intocarpentries:gh-pagesfrom
zkamvar:patch-1
Open
update LICENSE and COC links#458zkamvar wants to merge 1 commit intocarpentries:gh-pagesfrom zkamvar:patch-1
zkamvar wants to merge 1 commit intocarpentries:gh-pagesfrom
zkamvar:patch-1
Conversation
Contributor
|
This came up in another context before, where GitHub automatically links to a project's COC file. I agree that this should link to our CoC. |
Contributor
|
Thank you for the PR, Zhian. When maintainers synchronize lessons with We can link to https://docs.carpentries.org/topic_folders/policies/index_coc.html, however, I feel that we should discuss this change before implementing it |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since the user is always directed here, the links should point to the correct pages. The COC link is a bit bare, however since the relevant content is Jekyll-derived. Maybe we should just link the Carpentries code of conduct instead?