Skip to content

Conversation

@chrysn
Copy link
Contributor

@chrysn chrysn commented Jan 11, 2017

now they're rfcs they should be prominently linked

@chrysn
Copy link
Contributor Author

chrysn commented Jun 23, 2017

updated the pull request with etch and http-mapping; this makes it a bigger change structurally (paragraphs with highlights instead of headings for each item), but hopefully usable in presence of a growing number of related documents.

With the addition of FETCH/PATCH and HTTP mapping, the list of "other
specifications" would get unwieldily long if every document got its own
h3.

Grouping the specifications and giving each one just a paragraph should
make the list usable for some more documents.
This moves content formats with dependent specifications, and shortens or
rearranges the strong highlights for a more pleasant and accessible look.
@chrysn
Copy link
Contributor Author

chrysn commented Oct 16, 2024

We now have EDHOC, OSCORE, problem details … this is the overhauled list. Is it biased? Yes. Everyone please add in your bias in more PRs until we converge.

@chrysn
Copy link
Contributor Author

chrysn commented Oct 16, 2024

@cabo please review.

@chrysn chrysn changed the title Spec: Add links to blockwise and observe Spec: Extend coverage to 2020s Oct 21, 2024
@chrysn chrysn mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant