Fix for context error in django admin#1163
Conversation
| #def from_db_value(self, value, expression, connection, context): # removed due to context error | ||
| def from_db_value(self, value, expression, connection): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: UppercaseCharField.from_db_value() signature is incompatible with Django 5.2.5, expecting a context argument that is no longer passed, causing a TypeError.
Severity: CRITICAL | Confidence: High
🔍 Detailed Analysis
When a model instance containing an UppercaseCharField (e.g., postcode in address models) is retrieved from the database, Django 5.2.5 invokes UppercaseCharField.from_db_value() with three arguments (value, expression, connection). However, the UppercaseCharField.from_db_value() method signature at line 84 still expects four arguments, including context. This mismatch causes a TypeError: from_db_value() missing 1 required positional argument: 'context', leading to a server crash during database queries for address-related models.
💡 Suggested Fix
Update the UppercaseCharField.from_db_value() method signature at line 84 to remove the context parameter, matching the fix applied to NullCharField. The signature should be def from_db_value(self, value, expression, connection):.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: oscar/models/fields/__init__.py#L118-L119
Potential issue: When a model instance containing an `UppercaseCharField` (e.g.,
`postcode` in address models) is retrieved from the database, Django 5.2.5 invokes
`UppercaseCharField.from_db_value()` with three arguments (`value`, `expression`,
`connection`). However, the `UppercaseCharField.from_db_value()` method signature at
line 84 still expects four arguments, including `context`. This mismatch causes a
`TypeError: from_db_value() missing 1 required positional argument: 'context'`, leading
to a server crash during database queries for address-related models.
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
Reference ID: 4199600
No description provided.