Skip to content

Some new functionality#2

Open
doopydook wants to merge 22 commits intodozyatom:masterfrom
doopydook:master
Open

Some new functionality#2
doopydook wants to merge 22 commits intodozyatom:masterfrom
doopydook:master

Conversation

@doopydook
Copy link

Hey Donovan. I really like what you did with guide.js, especially because it builds around the element, rather than bringing the element out of the page. I added some functionality so the blurbs can be controlled from the HTML instead of JS, and there are some new options to make guide.js a little more flexible.

If you're willing, I'd really appreciate a second set of eyes, and if you like what you see, let's own this OSS together!

@dozyatom
Copy link
Owner

dozyatom commented Apr 6, 2014

Hey Ethan, thanks for the contributions. Defining steps in the html nodes was something I definitely did want added, but I don't think the exposed method approach should be removed. The idea was very much that it could play with other client-side js apps, with dynamic selector support (not to mention post step callbacks). If you can restore the exposed addStep method I can consider merging, otherwise we're also at risk of breaking backwards compatibility.

Also, the getMaximumZIndex method was one of the key requirements, as I don't feel it's safe to rely on a hard-coded value of 1000000 - it's much neater to automatically determine the optimal value. Perhaps this could be a config option with the method fallback?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants