Allow custom constraints to be passed to getUserMedia() #250
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There is currently no way to control the webcam media constraints. This PR changes that by allowing you to pass a `mediaConstraints` property in the `options` parameter of `tracking.track()`. This would be very useful if you want, for example, to use a low-res feed for faster color tracking or if you need to pick a specific webcam out of many. The suggested implementation is backwards-compatible.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is currently no way to control the webcam media constraints. This PR changes that by allowing you to pass a
mediaConstraintsproperty in theoptionsparameter oftracking.track().This would be very useful if you want, for example, to use a low-res feed for faster color tracking or if you need to pick a specific webcam out of many.
The suggested implementation is backwards-compatible.