Improve unittests #94
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#93 should be merged before this one, because I'm pulling in its commits to this branch. I'll then rebase, and the total review footprint of this one will shrink down.
I decided to not go totally ham and just replaced the
linear_modelmodule's tests for now, but potentially all modules' tests (except optimization and utils) can live under this structure.I'm not sure why the
lineardiffcan't find these basic derivatives, but right now I have it commented out in these tests, because the solver returns NaNs. Maybe I need to choose a different parameterization? Or maybe this method has deeper problems (#92?).