ci: alert on significant change of docker context #948
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* convert dockerignore from blacklist-based to whitelist * decrease docker build context size significantly * make docker builds less dependent on local state (e.g. local node_modules in submodules) * add script for checking docker build context * add CI tests to monitor if surprisingly large changes are made to the build context
This allows for full reporting before failure in the case of check(s) failing.
alxndrsn
pushed a commit
to alxndrsn/odk-central
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
This allows for full reporting before failure in the case of check(s) failing. Related: getodk#948
added 3 commits
February 9, 2026 10:53
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Spun off from #738
What has been done to verify that this works as intended?
CI.
Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?
Significant changes in the size of the docker build context is a sign that a configuration change has had a surprising effect.
How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?
No change.
Does this change require updates to documentation? If so, please file an issue here and include the link below.
No.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure you have:
nextbranch OR only changed documentation/infrastructure (masteris stable and used in production)