Conversation
|
I quite like this template. I agree that it's underused but I would argue we should put more effort into it rather than throw it away |
|
I don't like the template as it is now. Code quality its part of your daily job right? I also not have a checklist that i came out of bed everyday, and take some food and drink some water. The part for the exceptions like update the release document and if you put the migrations (because they are on a different repository) its can be handy if its more mandatory. Not sure if this is possible but if you put in that you need migrations you have to add the PR for this migrations. And this becomes more of the review part. That the reviewer also reviews the migrations or the notes in the release document. |
|
I made a check, to know how the checklist is used. Total PRs analyzed: 193 Template unchanged : 59 (30.6%) I don't think, wathever we do, that we could have that checklist filled by developpers if it's not enforced by a ci (like checking title) Aside of that, I don't think a checklist is really relevant, I'd prefer having meaningful information Here is a suggestion of template which will provide information on the PR, if there is a risk and information about releasing. Description
Impact & Rollout
Verification
Notes (optional)ContextData / MigrationsSecurity & Privacy |
New:
Description
Old
Description
Checklist
Code quality
Documentation
Deployment