Skip to content

Conversation

@jinyang628
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Summary

This pull request introduces improvements to the Slack integration, focusing on channel name matching and asynchronous operations in the SlackClient class.

  • Implemented Levenshtein distance-based channel name matching in backend/app/connectors/client/slack.py to handle slightly incorrect user inputs
  • Added asynchronous methods get_all_channel_names() and _repair_channel_names() in SlackClient for improved channel name handling
  • Updated backend/app/sandbox/integrations/slack.py to use async operations, removing agent-based test code
  • Modified backend/app/utils/levenshtein.py to return the original string when no close match is found, potentially affecting error handling

3 file(s) reviewed, 3 comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings

for channel in channels
if channel["name"].lower()
in request_channel_names_set # Slack channel names are always lower case
if channel["name"] in request.channel_names
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

logic: This comparison is now case-sensitive. Ensure this is intended behavior

async def _repair_channel_names(
self, request: SlackGetChannelIdRequest
) -> SlackGetChannelIdRequest:
possible_channel_names: list[str] = await self.get_all_channel_names()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style: This call might be redundant if get_all_channel_ids() already fetched the channel list

Comment on lines 30 to +31
if ratio(most_similar, target) < THRESHOLD:
return None
return target
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

logic: This change could lead to unexpected behavior in calling code that expects None for no match. Ensure all usages of this function are updated accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants