-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
compositor_vk: Increase descriptorCount safeguard for non-trivial descriptor consumption #95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
compositor_vk: Increase descriptorCount safeguard for non-trivial descriptor consumption #95
Conversation
…criptor consumption ... and update the TODO with a better description of the issue.
c2336da to
284fada
Compare
|
Latest CL addresses the real issue. Updated comment with better description of what would be needed to done to support this properly. |
| // descriptorCount value here for use with combined image samplers must account for non-trivial | ||
| // descriptorCount consumption, otherwise some drivers are throwing VK_ERROR_OUT_OF_POOL_MEMORY. | ||
| // This information needs to be obtained from: | ||
| // VkSamplerYcbcrConversionImageFormatProperties::combinedImageSamplerDescriptorCount, or from |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have an internal change in review (ag/37589469) that checks exactly this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Internal ... arggh 😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Coming soon™ :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aruby-blackberry can you confirm if 7ffe384 addresses?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will give it a try today and report back, thank you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jmacnak This works, please merge into main. Thank you! 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#96 merged!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.