Skip to content

Conversation

@hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl commented Jan 13, 2026

πŸ“‘ Description

βœ… Checks

  • Added test cases for my code

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @hwbrzzl, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the application's mailer functionality by integrating a comprehensive configuration system for email template rendering. It allows developers to define and manage various template engines, including built-in HTML rendering and custom implementations, providing greater flexibility in how email views are processed and displayed.

Highlights

  • Email Template Configuration: Introduced new configuration settings for email template rendering within config/mail.go. This includes defining a default template engine (e.g., "html"), specifying paths for mail views, and providing a structure for integrating custom template engines.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with πŸ‘ and πŸ‘Ž on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request appears to be part of an upgrade to v1.17.0, introducing a new template configuration for mail services. The changes are well-structured and add valuable flexibility for email templating. My review includes one suggestion to improve the provided example for a custom template engine, making it more straightforward for developers to use by clarifying required imports and implementations.

Comment on lines +59 to +61
// "via": func() (mail.Template, error) {
// return NewBladeTemplateEngine(), nil
// },

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The example for a custom template engine is a great addition. However, if a developer uncomments it as-is, the code will fail to compile because mail.Template is an unresolved reference and NewBladeTemplateEngine is undefined. To improve the developer experience and make this example more self-contained, I suggest adding inline comments to guide the user on what needs to be imported and implemented.

Suggested change
// "via": func() (mail.Template, error) {
// return NewBladeTemplateEngine(), nil
// },
// "via": func() (mail.Template, error) { // `mail` is from "github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/mail"
// return NewBladeTemplateEngine(), nil // `NewBladeTemplateEngine` is your implementation.
// },

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants