Update Rust crate clap_complete to v4.5.64

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
clap_complete	workspace.dependencies	patch	4.5.62 -> 4.5.64

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

clap-rs/clap (clap_complete)

v4.5.64

Compare Source

v4.5.63

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Updates dependency versions in Cargo.lock only.

• Bumps clap_complete to 4.5.64
• Aligns transitive windows-sys versions across many crates (moves from 0.59.0/0.60.2 to 0.61.2 or 0.52.0 as applicable) and refreshes checksums

No application code changes.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit a89a9cc. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust dependency graph by bumping clap_complete from 4.5.62 to 4.5.63.

Changes:

• Refreshes Cargo.lock with the new clap_complete version, updated checksums, and corresponding transitive dependency resolution changes (including windows-sys versions).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.02%. Comparing base (6d184f2) to head (a89a9cc).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8228   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.02%   59.02%           
=======================================
  Files        1187     1187           
  Lines      112486   112486           
  Branches     4939     4939           
=======================================
+ Hits        66394    66396    +2     
+ Misses      45334    45332    -2     
  Partials      758      758           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.19% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.732 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.356 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$22.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.847 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-60.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.433 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.571 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.579 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.57 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.96 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.44 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$52.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.975 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$417 \mathrm{ms} \pm 781 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.769 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$94.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.875 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 384 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$277 \mathrm{ms} \pm 839 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.019 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 135 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.605 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 244 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.327 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.681 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.784 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$7.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$93.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 417 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 365 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$58.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 386 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.059 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$48.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$77.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.103 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.752 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.628 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 484 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 547 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$38.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-62.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$558 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.25 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.628 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph